Federal Circuits, Fifth Circuit (June 17, 1981)
Docket number: 81-1265
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/reverend-clovis-segregation-box-38392839
Id. vLex: VLEX-38392839
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Muhammad vs. Wood (5th Cir. 1996)
U.S. Supreme Court - In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180 <I>(per curiam)</I> (1989)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Clovis Carl Green, Jr., Petitioner, v. Norman A. Carlson, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Et Al., Respondents. Clovis Carl Green, Jr., Petitioner, v. Jack Hanberry, Warden, Et Al., Respondents. Nos. 80-7922, 81-7191. Summary Calendar., 653 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1981) Jr., Petitioner, v. Norman A. Carlson, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Et Al., Respondents. Clovis Carl Green, Jr., Petitioner, v. Jack Hanberry, Warden, Et Al., Respondents. Nos. 80-7922, 81-7191. Summary Calendar.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Bansal vs. INS (5th Cir. 2004)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Bansal vs. Acosta (5th Cir. 2005)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Bansal vs. Consulate Gen India (5th Cir. 2004)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Bansal vs. Consulate Gen India (5th Cir. 2004)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Bansal vs. Consulate Gen India (5th Cir. 2004)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Downs vs. TDCJ (5th Cir. 1997)
Clovis C. Green, Jr., pro se.
Edward Charles Prado, Interim U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for respondents.Order on Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Etc.Before GEE, RUBIN and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.GEE, Circuit Judge:Clovis Carl Green, Jr., brings to us yet another congeries of pro se motions demanding special treatment, instant action, mandamus, habeas corpus, etc. Green, the instigator of hundreds of frivolous and malicious pro se actions,[fn1] is the subject of a recent order of this court, filed April 27, 1981, and appended at the foot. The motions before us, filed April 20, are not controlled by that order.We have therefore carefully examined them and find them to be frivolous, advanced in forma pauperis, and void of claim that Green's constitutional rights have been invaded by reason of physical harm or threats to Green's person. As such, they continue Green's "pattern of malicious and frivolous filings" noted in our earlier order. Prisoners and others have honest claims upon our limited capacities of time and judgment. The attention which Green's spurious ones have demanded insures that other claims of arguable merit must tarry. In the event that Green's pattern continues, we commend the contempt sanction to any panel upon which he seeks to impose. Today we forbear, since the instant flock were prepared and presented before the entry of our order appended. They areDISMISSED. [fn1]Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access