Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (August 31, 2000)
Docket number: 00-6835
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/richardson-v-tillman-18261415
Id. vLex: VLEX-18261415
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITNo. 00-6835 CARLTON RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGARRY TILLMAN; LUIS CARTER; DARLEAN DAVIS; MS. DAVIS; ANGELA RICHARDSON; OFFICER WIGGINS;SERGEANT HAWKINS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.(CA-99-747-5-F)Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 31, 2000Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, SeniorCircuit Judge.Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Carlton Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAMCarlton Richardson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing some claims and some Defendants from his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint, and directing further proceedings as to Richardson’s claim that Defendants Hawkins and Wiggins assaulted him. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSEDTry vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access