Federal Circuits, Fourth Circuit (April 24, 2003)
Docket number: 03-6241
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/stokes-v-peguese-18202957
Id. vLex: VLEX-18202957
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITNo. 03-6241 GEORGE STOKES, Petitioner - Appellant, versusJAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTHE STATE OF MARYLAND, a/k/a Joseph Curran,Jr., Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA--2432-PJM)Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 24, 2003Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.George Stokes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., AttorneyGeneral, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAMGeorge Stokes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (2000).We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Stokes has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Stokes v. Peguese , No. CA-02-2432-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSEDTry vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access