David Subin And Benjamin Subin, Doing Business Under The Trade Name And Style Of Arcadia Hosiery Company And American Federation Of Hosiery Workers, Branch No. 67, 467 (1939)

In the Matter of DAVID SUBIN AND BENJAMIN SUBIN, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE TRADE NAME AND STYLE OF ARCADIA HOSIERY COMPANY and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF HOSIERY WORKERS, BRANCH No. 67 Case No. C-~75.-Decided April 27, 1939 Hosiery Manufacturing Industry-Interference, Restraint, and Coercion: expressed opposition to outside labor organization; threat to close plant and discharge employees-Company-Dominated Union: domination of and interference with formation and administration; support; suggesting formation; respondents ordered to withdraw recognition from and disestablish as agency for collective bargaining-Discrimination: discharges; for union membership and activity; charges of, not sustained as to one employee-Reinstatement Ordered:

discharged employees-Back Pay: awarded.

Mr. Bernard Bralove, for the Board.

Wessel, Bennett & Weiss, by Mr. Charles J. Weiss, of Philadelphia,

Pa., for the respondents.

Mr. Isadore Katz, of Philadelphia, Pa., for the Hosiery Workers.

Mr. Thomas F. Gain, of Philadelphia, Pa., for the Shop Committee.

Mr. Victor A. Pascal, of counsel to the Board.

DECISION AND ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon charges and amended charges duly filed by American Federation of Hosiery Workers, Branch No. 67, herein called the Hosiery Workers, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, by Stanley W. Root, Regional Director for the Fourth Region (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), issued its complaint dated April 1, 1938, against David Subin and Benjamin Subin, Lansdale, Pennsylvania, partners doing business under the trade name and style of Arcadia Hosiery Company, herein called the respondents, alleging that the respondents had engaged in and were engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce, within the meaning of Section 8 (1), (2), and (3), and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. The complaint and accompanying notice of hearing were duly served upon the respondents and the Hosiery Workers.

With respect to the unfair labor practices, the complaint alleged in substance that the respondents dominated and interfered with the formation of the Shop Committee, a labor organization, and contributed support to it; discharged 12 employees because they had joined and assisted the Hosiery Workers; and, by these and other acts, interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act. Thereafter, the respondents filed an answer denying the alleged unfair labor practices.

Pursuant to the notice, a hearing was held on April 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 20, 1938, at...

If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here