The General Tire & Rubber Co., 474 (1964)

National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board (November 05, 1964)

Docket number: 26-CA-01726


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/the-general-tire-rubber-co-43322134
Id. vLex: VLEX-43322134

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Sponsored Ads:


Extract:

The General Tire & Rubber Co., 474 (1964)

RECOMMENDED ORDER

It is recommended that the complaint and amendment to the complaint be dismissed in their entirety.

The General Tire & Rubber Company, Chemical Plastics Division and United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastics Workers of America, AFL-CIO. Case No. 06-CA-1726. November 5, 1964 DECISION AND ORDER

On August 3, 1964, Trial Examiner Samuel M. Singer issued his Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had not engaged in the unfair labor practices alleged in the amended complaint and recommending dismissal of the amended complaint in its entirety, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision. Thereafter, the General Counsel filed exceptions to the Trial Examiner's Decision and a supporting brief, and the Respondent filed a reply brief.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Leedom, Fanning, and Brown].

The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Trial Examiner's Decision, the exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in this proceeding, and hereby adopts the findings,' conclusions, and recommendation of the Trial Examiner.

[The Board dismissed the amended complaint.] 'The General Counsel excepted to the credibility findings made by the Trial Examiner.

It Is the Board's established policy, however, not to overrule a Trial Examiner' s resolutions with respect to credibility unless, as is not the case here , the clear preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces us that the resolutions were incorrect . Standard ...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
Jack G Kelly Plaintiff-Appellee v Charles C Foti Jr. Defendant-Appellant City of New Orleans John Doe and Jane Roe Defendants. 77 F.3d 819 5... | OBITUARY ; Silvania Tavares, at 87, resident of Fall River | stearns schenck students transform eyesore into art | decisão monocrática nº 2005/0108501-7 of superior tribunal de justiça - quarta ... | Acordao n 90-0295 of Tribunal Constitucional, of July 03, 1991 | Massachusetts se convierte en el primer estado de EEUU que legaliza los matrimonios homosexuales | mode action société anonyme rue e cavell 147 1180 bruxelles r.c bruxelles... | N 1999.34.00.026859-0 of Tribunal Regional Federal da 1a Regiao, of September 18, 2001 | Accordo in forma di scambio di lettere relativo all applicazione provvisoria delle modifiche al proto... | Entscheidungstext 7Ob300/97m - Oberster Gerichtshof, November 11, 1997