The Secretary for Law v John Sibulewa Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
JudgeFrost ACJ, Clarkson J, Prentice J
Judgment Date26 September 1974
Citation[1974] PNGLR 135
Year1974
CourtSupreme Court
Judgement NumberFC66

Full Title: The Secretary for Law v John Sibulewa Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135

Full Court: Frost ACJ, Clarkson J, Prentice J

Judgment Delivered: 26 September 1974

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

[SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE]

THE SECRETARY FOR LAW

V

KWAUGA

Port Moresby

Frost ACJ Clarkson Prentice JJ

24 September 1974

26 September 1974

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE — Appeal — Appeal against sentence — Application to increase sentence — Unlawful carnal knowledge — Term of four years' imprisonment, substituted for term of two years and restriction of movement order — Extent of Court's discretion — Supreme Court (Full Court) Act 1968, s. 28 (4) Supreme Court (Full Court) Act, s. 28 (4):

On an appeal against sentence the Full Court, if it is of opinion that some other sentence, whether more or less severe, is warranted in law and should have been passed, shall quash the sentence and pass the other sentence in substitution therefor, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal, s. 29 (1) Supreme Court (Full Court) Act, s. 29 (1):

The Secretary for Law may appeal to the Full Court against any decision of a Judge, whether on appeal or sitting as a court of first instance, as to sentence, and the Court may in its discretion vary the sentence and impose such sentence as it thinks proper.2 — Criminal Law (Restriction of Movement) Act 1962, s. 4 (1).Criminal Law (Restriction of Movement) Act 1962, s. 4 (1):

Where a person is convicted on indictment of an offence against a law in force in the Territory or a part of the Territory, the court which convicts him may, in addition to or in lieu of any other punishment which may be imposed, order that —

(a) that person shall not come or be within such part of the Territory as is specified in the order; or

(b) that person shall be deported to and remain in such part of the Territory as is specified by the Administrator in Council,

during such period as is specified in the order.3

The respondent was convicted on a charge under s. 212 of the Criminal Code (Queensland adopted) of unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of twelve years and sentenced to two years' imprisonment with hard labour. The trial judge also made an order under s. 4 (1) (b) of the Criminal Law (Restriction of Movement) Act 1962.

On appeal against the inadequacy of the sentence by the Secretary for Law;

Held

(1) In the circumstances of the case a sentence of two years' imprisonment (even coupled with a restriction of movement order) was manifestly inadequate.

(2) The trial judge had proceeded on a wrong principle in not having sufficient regard to the consideration of deterring both the respondent and others, and insufficient weight had been given to the need to protect the public and in particular young girls, from this type of offence, and accordingly the appeal should be allowed.

(3) The order for deportation to and confinement in a particular part of Papua New Guinea pursuant to s. 4 (1) (b) of the Criminal Law (Restriction of Movement) Act 1962 should be quashed as the particular area nominated in the order had not been specified pursuant to the section.

(4) Accordingly the sentence should be varied by imposing in lieu of the sentence of two years' imprisonment a sentence of four years' imprisonment.

Per curiam. The construction which this Court has adopted of s. 29 (1) of the Supreme Court (Full Court) Act 1968, is that it confers an unfettered discretion upon the Court but that the Court should not interfere with the sentence appealed against unless it is clearly satisfied that the sentence should be altered (Reg. v. Pia-Afu [1971-72] P. & N.G.L.R. 393 and Reg. v. Harley [1971-72] P. & N.G.L.R. 399), and the Court would wish to follow its own decisions unless they are shown to be wrong or there were weighty considerations to the contrary.

Appeal

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • The State v Peter Lare (2004) N2557
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • May 20, 2004
    ...that not all judgments have been published. Of those published, one of the earliest reported cases is, The Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135. There the trial judge imposed a sentence of 2 years, which was on appeal increased to 4 years as the appellate court considered the sentenc......
  • The State v Kemai Lumou (2004) N2684
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • September 23, 2004
    ...v Nivi Araba [1999] PNGLR 131, The State v Damien Mangawi (2003) N2419, The State v Dii Gideon (2002) N2335, Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, The State v Louise Paraka (2002) N2317, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, The Stat......
  • The State v Siaro Unde
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • March 3, 1999
    ...young children. 4 Goli Golu v State [1979] PNGLR 553, Secretary for Law v Kabua Dewake [1975] PNGLR 100, The Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, The State v Raphael Kuengu [1993] PNGLR 124 and John Aubuku v The State [1987] PNGLR 267 referred to ___________________________ Akuram J......
  • Public Prosecutor v John Aia of Mondo and Peter Pino of Idu
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1978
    ...in this period since R v Pia–Afu [1971–72] PNGLR 393 and R v Harley [1971–72] PNGLR 399 were decided. See Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, Public Prosecutor v Terrence Kaveku [1977] PNGLR 110, Public Prosecutor v Wiwi Gok [1977] PNGLR 161, Public Prosecutor v Willy Moke Soki [19......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • The State v Peter Lare (2004) N2557
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • May 20, 2004
    ...that not all judgments have been published. Of those published, one of the earliest reported cases is, The Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135. There the trial judge imposed a sentence of 2 years, which was on appeal increased to 4 years as the appellate court considered the sentenc......
  • The State v Kemai Lumou (2004) N2684
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • September 23, 2004
    ...v Nivi Araba [1999] PNGLR 131, The State v Damien Mangawi (2003) N2419, The State v Dii Gideon (2002) N2335, Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, The State v Louise Paraka (2002) N2317, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, The Stat......
  • Public Prosecutor v John Aia of Mondo and Peter Pino of Idu
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1978
    ...in this period since R v Pia–Afu [1971–72] PNGLR 393 and R v Harley [1971–72] PNGLR 399 were decided. See Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, Public Prosecutor v Terrence Kaveku [1977] PNGLR 110, Public Prosecutor v Wiwi Gok [1977] PNGLR 161, Public Prosecutor v Willy Moke Soki [19......
  • The State v Siaro Unde
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • March 3, 1999
    ...young children. 4 Goli Golu v State [1979] PNGLR 553, Secretary for Law v Kabua Dewake [1975] PNGLR 100, The Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, The State v Raphael Kuengu [1993] PNGLR 124 and John Aubuku v The State [1987] PNGLR 267 referred to ___________________________ Akuram J......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT