The State v Bernard Konombo

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
JudgeBidar AJ
Judgment Date21 November 1997
Citation(1997) N1742
CourtNational Court
Year1997
Judgement NumberN1742

National Court: Bidar AJ

Judgment Delivered: 21 November 1997

N1742

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

[In the National Court of Justice]

CR. 1214/97

THE STATE

-v-

BERNARD KONOMBO

MADANG : BIDAR, AJ.

1997 : 19 & 21 November

CRIMINAL LAW - Unlawful Carnal Knowledge - Plea of guilty -

Victim nine (9) years and three (3) months

old - repeated acts of sexual intercourse -

Features of aggravation - Hymen torn -

Presence of gonococci

CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence - Prior Conviction for similar

offence - absence of proper guidelines -

guidelines analogous to rape - Principles

in rape appropriate - Four years

imprisonment.

CASES CITED

The following cases are cited in the Judgement.

John Aubuku -v- The State [1987] PNGLR 267

The State -v- Sotie Apusa [1988-89] PNGLR 170

The State -v- Komai Airi CR. 1290/96

Mr M. Ruarri, for the State.

Mr D. Sakumai, for the Accused.


JUDGEMENT ON SENTENCE

21 November 1997

BIDAR, AJ.: BERNARD KONOMBO, you have pleaded guilty to the charge that, on the 14th June 1997, you had sexual intercourse with a girl called, LYDIA PHILIP, a girl under the age of twelve years old. This is an offence under s. 213 of the Criminal Code Act (Ch. 262).

The circumstances of the offence are fairly simple. On Saturday 14 June 1997, at Silibob village, you approached victim’s parents and asked them if you could take the victim, Lydia Philip, to visit M.V. DOULOS at the town main wharf. The victim’s parents agreed and so you took her away. Instead of visiting M.V. Doulos you took her to a friend’s house at the ‘public tank’ area, Sissiak. You spent the night of Saturday 14th and Sunday 15th June, where you slept with victim in the same room and on same bed and had sexual intercourse with her. You had sexual intercourse with her on two previous occasions. Once by the creek in the village and second time was in Suckling’s house at Silibob village. Suckling is your wantok from Oro Province, married to a Silibob woman. On Monday 15 June 1997 after you returned from work, you took victim back to her parents at Silibob village. There at the village, she reported to her parents of what you did to her. Subsequently, the matter was reported to Police and you were arrested and charged for this offence. On the facts it seems to me, you should have been charged with at least three acts of unlawful carnal knowledge of the same victim.

Section 213 of the Criminal Code prescribes the offence you are charged with. It is in these terms:

“(1) a person who has unlawful carnal knowledge

of a girl under the age of 12 years is guilty of

a crime.

Penalty: Subject to section 19,

imprisonment for life.

(2) ..........

(3) In the case of an offender whose age does not

exceed 16 years, the Court, instead of sentencing

him to any term of imprisonment, may order him

to be sent to an industrial or reformatory school

for a period not exceeding three years.”

I am not sure whether there are industrial or reformatory schools and whether Boys Towns in Wewak, Erap and other places are classified as such.

It is a serious offence as the penalty reflects it’s seriousness. Under the Code, three sexual offences attract life imprisonment. The offence of rape under s. 347, offence of unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 12 years old under s. 213 and incest by man under s. 223.

It is unlawful to have sexual intercourse with girls under the age of twelve years old, because they are immature and incapable of appreciating such acts.

On your allocutus, you say it was your first time to commit such an offence. But I find this is not so. You were convicted by this Court of similar offence committed on the 31st March 1997 on a girl under the age of 16 years old. The victim according to the photostat copy of the page of her clinic book was born on 7th March 1988. On my calculation she was nine years, three months and one week old at the time of the offence. A medical...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • The State v Peter Lare (2004) N2557
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 20 May 2004
    ...of 12 years imprisonment imposed—Criminal Code s213 and s19.2 The State v Peter Yawoma (2001) N2032, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, The State v Eddie Peter (No 2) (2001) N2297, The State v Edward Toude (No 2) (2001) N2299, Mary Bomai......
  • The State v Kemai Lumou (2004) N2684
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 23 September 2004
    ...Damien Mangawi (2003) N2419, The State v Dii Gideon (2002) N2335, Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, The State v Louise Paraka (2002) N2317, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, The State v Eddie Peter (No 2) (2001) N2297, Gimble......
  • The State v Damien Mangawi (2003) N2419
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 13 June 2003
    ...Yawoma (2001) N2032, The State v Joseph Minjihau (2002) N2243, The State v Moki Lepi (No 2) (2002) N2278, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, John Aubuku v The State [1987] PNGLR 267, The State v Sottie Apusa [1988–89] PNGLR 170, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, Thomas W......
3 cases
  • The State v Peter Lare (2004) N2557
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 20 May 2004
    ...of 12 years imprisonment imposed—Criminal Code s213 and s19.2 The State v Peter Yawoma (2001) N2032, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, The State v Eddie Peter (No 2) (2001) N2297, The State v Edward Toude (No 2) (2001) N2299, Mary Bomai......
  • The State v Kemai Lumou (2004) N2684
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 23 September 2004
    ...Damien Mangawi (2003) N2419, The State v Dii Gideon (2002) N2335, Secretary for Law v Kwauga [1974] PNGLR 135, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, The State v Louise Paraka (2002) N2317, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, The State v Eddie Peter (No 2) (2001) N2297, Gimble......
  • The State v Damien Mangawi (2003) N2419
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 13 June 2003
    ...Yawoma (2001) N2032, The State v Joseph Minjihau (2002) N2243, The State v Moki Lepi (No 2) (2002) N2278, The State v Bernard Konombo (1997) N1742, John Aubuku v The State [1987] PNGLR 267, The State v Sottie Apusa [1988–89] PNGLR 170, James Mora Meaoa v The State [1996] PNGLR 280, Thomas W......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT