The State v Honenu Kinzong (2005) N2942
Jurisdiction | Papua New Guinea |
Judge | Kirriwom J |
Judgment Date | 13 October 2005 |
Citation | (2005) N2942 |
Docket Number | CR 1013 of 2005 |
Court | National Court |
Year | 2005 |
Judgement Number | N2942 |
Full Title: CR 1013 of 2005; The State v Honenu Kinzong (2005) N2942
National Court: Kirriwom J
Judgment Delivered: 13 October 2005
N2942
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
]IN THE NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]
CR. 1013 OF 2005
THE STATE
-V-
HONENU KINZONG
LAE: KIRRIWOM, J
2005: 24th August & 13th October
Cases cited:
Counsels:
N. Miviri for the State
S. Maliaki for the Accused
13th October 2005
KIRRIWOM, J: The prisoner Honenu Kinzong from Siririo village Finschafen Morobe Province appeared before the National Court siting in Finschafen on circuit in August 2005 on one count of stealing with actual violence whilst in company of others and armed with dangerous weapons namely bush knives and home-made guns. He pleaded guilty to the charge.
The State alleged that the prisoner was amongst a group of people who were at Siriroi village on 3 March 2005 waiting to hold up motor vehicles travelling on Finschafen – Pindiu Road. About 3 pm a vehicle driven by one Nidi Boti drove up on its way to Pindiu. The prisoner and others jumped onto the road and blocked it from proceeding further with their guns. The driver stopped and after ordering the passengers out of the vehicle and ordering them to sleep on the ground, they searched the vehicle. Amongst the passengers was a businessman from Pindiu Maus Toping with supplies for his trade store. These goods were stolen from the vehicle as well as K1,500 in cash from Maus Toping and those on the vehicle. Total of cash and goods was K4,500 loss suffered.
After the robbery the vehicle proceeded to Pindiu but on the return journey reported the incident to the Police. The prisoner was actually recognized by the passengers as a local from the village and was named as a member of the gang. He went into hiding immediately after the robbery but was subsequently arrested. His involvement in the robbery is freely admitted in his own interview with the Police.
This offence carries a maximum of life imprisonment. Under the Gimble guidelines this robbery falls in the third category which is robbery of motor vehicle on a highway with a starting sentence of 8 years on a trial and less in a plea of guilty or where there are exceptional mitigating circumstances since Tau Jim Anis & Ors –v- The State.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The State v Peter Yandi (2010) N4064
...(2004) N2645; The State v Warip Mondol (2004) N2707; The State v. Tommy Yare & Anor, CR 1828 of 2003 (2004); The State v Honenu Kinzong (2005) N2942; Saperus Yalibakut v The State (2006) SC890; The State v Jackson Nimai (2008) N3355; The State v Jonathan Sengi (2009) N3692 DECISION ON SENTE......
-
The State v Jackson Nimai (2008) N3355
...(2004) N2645 The State -v- Warip Mondol, Luwi Nehie, Kupim Pepilo, Paul Embril and Dain Sonk (2004) N2707 The State -v- Honenu Kinzong (2005) N2942 Legislations Cited: Criminal Code Ch 262 Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991 Counsel: Mr M. Ruari, for the State. Mr P.Kumo, for the Prisoner.......
-
The State v Peter Yandi (2010) N4064
...(2004) N2645; The State v Warip Mondol (2004) N2707; The State v. Tommy Yare & Anor, CR 1828 of 2003 (2004); The State v Honenu Kinzong (2005) N2942; Saperus Yalibakut v The State (2006) SC890; The State v Jackson Nimai (2008) N3355; The State v Jonathan Sengi (2009) N3692 DECISION ON SENTE......
-
The State v Jackson Nimai (2008) N3355
...(2004) N2645 The State -v- Warip Mondol, Luwi Nehie, Kupim Pepilo, Paul Embril and Dain Sonk (2004) N2707 The State -v- Honenu Kinzong (2005) N2942 Legislations Cited: Criminal Code Ch 262 Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991 Counsel: Mr M. Ruari, for the State. Mr P.Kumo, for the Prisoner.......