Thompson v. Mitchell (4th Cir. 1999)

Federal Circuits, Fourth Circuit (November 23, 1999)

Docket number: 99-7084


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/thompson-v-mitchell-18327868
Id. vLex: VLEX-18327868

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7084 MASON THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SHERIFF MITCHELL, Sheriff of Richmond City

Jail; LYNN HENRY, Law Librarian, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-98-1170)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mason Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Vir-

ginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on August 6, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on August 10, 1999. Pursuant to the

Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered

on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the dis-

trict court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray

, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234- 35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:

Mason Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See

Thompson v. Mitchell

, No. CA-98-1170 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 1999). * We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access