The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and Dispute Settlement under UNCLOS III

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution (2006)

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel
Section: Part III: Supranational Dispute Resolution Bodies
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/tribunal-dispute-settlement-unclos-445410
Id. vLex: VLEX-445410

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

1) Introduction. -2) Historical Overview. -3) The Dispute Resolution Provisions of Part XV of UNCLOS III: Section 1: General Provisions. Section 2: Compulsory Procedures. Section 3: Limitations and Exceptions. -4) The Statute of ITLOS - The Tribunal: Annex VI: Section 1: Organisation of the Tribunal. Section 2: Competence / Jurisdiction of the Tribunal and Applicable Law. Section 3: Procedure of the Tribunal. Section 4: Seabed Disputes Chamber. Section 5. -5) The ITLOS Caseload and Some Decisions: i) The M/V "Saiga" Case. ii) The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases. iii) The Mox Plant Case. iv) The M/V "Saiga" (No 2) Case: Decision on the Merits. -6) Conciliation: Annex V. -7) Arbitration: Annex VII. -8) Special Arbitration: Annex VIII. -9) Conclusions.

Extract:

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and Dispute Settlement under UNCLOS III

1) Introduction

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) is the third international dispute settlement body to be considered in this part of the Manual. It was created by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III). The Convention provides for dispute resolution by way of both arbitration and conciliation, permits disputes to be decided ex aequo et bono (provided the parties agree) and makes provisions for the establishment of a fact-finding Tribunal.

Part XV of UNCLOS III contains the provisions relating to the settlement of disputes. Article 284 in Part XV contains provisions dealing with Conciliation (the detail is set out in Annex V). Article 287 contains the choice of four means for the settlement of disputes relating to the interpretation and application of the Convention: through the Tribunal itself (the ITLOS Statute is set out in Annex VI); through the International Court of Justice (ICJ); through Arbitration (the relevant provisions are contained in Annex VII); or through Special Arbitration (the provisions are set out in Annex VIII).

This chapter will look at the Law of the Sea Convention, the Statute of ITLOS, cases decided by the Tribunal, the Conciliation provisions, the Arbitration provisions and the Special Arbitration provisions.

2) Historical Overview

UNCLOS III came into force on 16 November 1994. In October 1996, the Tribunal began to function at its seat in Hamburg.

The other supranational dispute resolution bodies considered in the Manual - the ICJ, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) - were all made the primary court or tribunal by the instruments that created them: the United Nations Charter, the 1899 Hague Peace Conference and the ICSID Convention.

UNCLOS III, on the other hand, gave jurisdiction to resolve disputes not only to ITLOS but also to other tribunals. In all, as noted above, there are four procedures for dispute resolution under the 1982 Convention. The UNCLOS dispute settlement procedures are complex. This is hardly surprising given the complexity of the subject matter: two-thirds of the Earth's surface is covered by water, and the Convention contains a universal legal regime dealing with, among other things, the territorial sea, exclusive economic zones, the continental shelf and delimitation.

3) The Dispute Resolution Provisions of Part XV of UNCLOS III

Parts of UNCLOS III have been considered earlier in the Manual. For example, Part II of the Convention deals with the territorial sea and contiguous zone; Part V with the exclusive economic zone; and Part VI with the continental shelf. The Part to be considered now is Part XV, which is concerned with dispute resolution.

Part XV is divided into three Sections: Section 1 (Articles 279-285) contains gen...

see the complete text now
If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:



Documentos Relacionados:


A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

Expert Determination

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) Introduction. -2) Expert Determination and Arbitration. -3) Reported Cases Dealing With Expert Determination. -4) Some Institutions Offering Expert Determination: i) The International Chamber of...

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) Introduction. -2) ADR: An Overview. -3) Institutions Offering ADR Systems: Introduction. i) The CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution. ii) The American Arbitration Association. iii) The Internati...

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

International Commercial Arbitral Institutions and Other International Bodies

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

A. International Commercial Arbitral Institutions and their Arbitration Rules: -1) Introduction. -2) The London Court of International Arbitration: i) Introduction. ii) The LCIA Arbitration Rules. ...

A Manual of International Dispute Resolution - (January 01, 2006)

International Commercial Arbitration

Anthony Connerty - Barrister and member of WIPO arbitration panel

1) Introduction: Advantages of Arbitration. Disadvantages of Arbitration. -2) The Agreement to Arbitrate. -3) The Course of an International Arbitration: UNCITRAL Notes on Organising Arbitral Proce...

Other documents:
Fitch Downgrades First Industrial s IDR to BBB- Outlook Stable | Compania Navarra de Servicios Integrales, S. A. | ArthroCare to Announce First Quarter Financial Results April 18. | acuerdo nº 8379555400 of 1ª câmara de direito público, of december 16, 2008 | LJN: AD6888, Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage, AWB 99/10081 | Decisao Monocratica N 70026856476 of Tribunal de Justica do RS - Nona Camara Civel, of October 14, 2008 | No Furnishings Removed Mea [India] | ahmed azouz v. mci, 2002 cfpi 717 (2002) | Acórdão Nº 70017018003 of Tribunal de Justiça do RS - Décima Câmara Cível, of May 10, 2007 | Decisão Monocrática Nº 2007/0083460-9 of Superior Tribunal de Justiça Segunda Turma of April 23 2008 | Houthandel Kevok naamloze vennootschap Romershovenstraat 70 3730 Hoeselt H.R Tongeren 69580 BTW 443.824.884 Gezien ...

Previous | Table of Contents | Next