General Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 270 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, Afl-Cio, Et Al., Petitioners, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent., 252 F.2d 619 (D.C. Cir. 1958)

Federal Circuits, D.C. Cir. (January 23, 1958)

Docket number: 13968


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/truck-drivers-chauffeurs-36666566
Id. vLex: VLEX-36666566

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Willmut Gas and Oil Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors. Mississippi Valley Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors. Philadelphis Electric Company and the United Gas Improvement Company, Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors., 299 F.2d 111 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors. Mississippi Valley Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors. Philadelphis Electric Company and the United Gas Improvement Company, Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors.

U.S. Supreme Court - FPC v. Sunray DX Oil Co., 391 U.S. 9 (1968)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Amarillo General Drivers, Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No. 577, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent., 273 F.2d 519 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Granite City Steel Company Et Al., Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, St. Charles Gas Corporation, Missouri Natural Gas Company, Laclede Gas Company, Intervenors. Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, St. Charles Gas Corporation, Missouri Natural Gas Company, Laclede Gas Company, Intervenors., 320 F.2d 711 (D.C. Cir. 1963) Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, St. Charles Gas Corporation, Missouri Natural Gas Company, Laclede Gas Company, Intervenors. Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, St. Charles Gas Corporation, Missouri Natural Gas Company, Laclede Gas Company, Intervenors.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - American Louisiana Pipe Line Company Et Al., Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent., 344 F.2d 525 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent., 306 F.2d 345 (5th Cir. 1962)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, Illinois Power Company, Laclede Gas Company, Midsouth Gas Company, Intervenors., 281 F.2d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1960) Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, Illinois Power Company, Laclede Gas Company, Midsouth Gas Company, Intervenors.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Superior Derrick Corporation, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Seafarers' International Union of North America, Atlantic and Gulf District, Harbor and Inland Waterways Division, Afl-Cio, Respondent., 273 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1960)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Cir. - Indiana and Michigan Municipal Distributors Association, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Intervenor. City of Anderson, Indiana and City of Auburn, Indiana, Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Indiana & Michigan Municipal Distributors Ass'N, Intervenors., 659 F.2d 1193 (D.C. Cir. 1981) Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Intervenor. City of Anderson, Indiana and City of Auburn, Indiana, Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent, Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Indiana & Michigan Municipal Distributors Ass'N, Intervenors.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Cir. - Cities Service Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, Continental Oil Company, City Group Gas Defense Association, City of Springfield, Missouri, and the Board of Public Utilities of Springfield, Missouri, Intervenors., 424 F.2d 411 (10th Cir. 1970) Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, Continental Oil Company, City Group Gas Defense Association, City of Springfield, Missouri, and the Board of Public Utilities of Springfield, Missouri, Intervenors.

Text:

On Petition to Review and on Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

Mr. Arnold Ordman, Atty., N. L. R. B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., were on the brief, for respondent.

Mr. Owsley Vose, Atty., N. L. R. B., also entered an appearance for respondent.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and DANAHER and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The union asks us to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring it to cease and desist from certain picketing found to violate § 8(b) (4)(A) and (B) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 141, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(b) (4) (A) and (B), and to post the customary notices. The Board asks us to enforce its order.

The union does not dispute the factual findings which underlie the Board's order. It contests only the Board's conclusion that the picketing violated the secondary boycott provisions of the Act. On this point we deem ourselves bound by this court's opinion in Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union 728, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 101 U.S.App.D. C. 420, 249 F.2d 512, decided October 28, 1957. We therefore enforce the Board's order.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access