U.S. v. Willard (10th Cir. 1999)

Federal Circuits, 10th Cir. (July 12, 1999)

Docket number: 98-4159


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/u-s-v-willard-18483404
Id. vLex: VLEX-18483404

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WYATT B. WILLARD,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-4159

(District of Utah)

(D.C. No. 98-CR-122-1)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT(*)

Before TACHA, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Wyatt B. Willard appeals from the district court's entry of judgment and sentence on his guilty plea to armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2113(a) and (d). Willard asserts that the United States breached its plea agreement when it refused to recommend to the district court a sentence at the low end of the sentencing range. In its appellate brief, the United States concedes error and requests that Willard's sentence be vacated and the case remanded to the district court for resentencing. Based on the arguments set forth in Willard's appellate brief and the United States' concession of error, this court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, VACATES Willard's sentence, and REMANDS the case to the district court for resentencing. Although Willard disclaims any desire to be resentenced before a different judge, under the particular facts of this case, we leave that determination to the district court on remand. See United States v. Brye, 146 F.3d 1207, 1213 (10th Cir. 1998).

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge

FOOTNOTES

Click footnote number to return to corresponding location in the text.

*. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access