United States of America, Appellee, v. Brigido Sanchez-Mata, Appellant., 429 F.2d 1391 (9th Cir. 1970)

Federal Circuits, 9th Cir. (August 03, 1970)

Docket number: 25304

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/united-america-brigido-sanchez-mata-36744343
Id. vLex: VLEX-36744343

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Herrera, v. United States., 208 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1954)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - Virginia Lawrence Bland and Raymond Lee Wilson, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee., 299 F.2d 105 (5th Cir. 1962)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Robert Parker, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee., 400 F.2d 248 (9th Cir. 1968)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilario Gonzalez-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant., 534 F.2d 1353 (9th Cir. 1976)

U.S. Supreme Court - Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Moises Cantu, Defendant-Appellant., 501 F.2d 1019 (7th Cir. 1972)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Germaine Haili, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Earl K. H. Kim, Defendant-Appellant., 443 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1971)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Trinidad Terrazas-Carrasco, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-1429. Summary Calendar., 861 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1988)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Douglas S. Stanley (argued), Tom Cole, Westover, Keddie & Choules, Yuma, Ariz., for appellant.

Richard S. Burke (argued), U. S. Atty., N. Warner Lee, Ass't. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.

Before KOELSCH and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and HALL,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Immigration officers lawfully stopped the car driven by the defendant and lawfully interrogated the persons therein. Title 8, U.S.C., Sec. 1357.

The conversations with the backseat aliens were in the presence of the defendant and were not hearsay.

The evidence as to whether Sandoval (the illegally transported alien) was illegally in the Country was conflicting and was resolved by the jury whose verdict as triers of the fact this appellate court will not disturb. The admission of the evidence of simultaneous violations of transporting other aliens was not error. Gianotos v. United States (9 Cir. 1939), 104 F.2d 929; Schwartz v. United States (9 Cir. 1947), 160 F.2d 718; Parker v. United States (9 Cir. 1968), 400 F.2d 248, cert. den. 393 U.S. 1097, 89 S.Ct. 892, 21 L.Ed.2d 789.

The orally requested instruction was properly refused. F.R.Crim.P. 30; Local Rules, District of Arizona No. 25. Moreover, the subject of the orally requested instruction was fully covered by the instructions given.

The claim of unconstitutionality of Title 8, U.S.C., Sec. 1324(a) (2), is frivolous. Herrera v. United States (9 Cir. 1953), 208 F.2d 215, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 927, 74 S.Ct. 529, 98 L.Ed. 1080; Bland v. United States (5 Cir. 1962), 299 F.2d 105, hold the statute is valid.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Notes:

* Honorable Peirson M. Hall, Senior United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation