United Kingdom Tax Bulletin (October 2008)
CURRENT RATES
October 2008
Indexation
Retail price index: September 2008
Inflation rate: September 2008
218.4
5%
Indexation factor from March 1982:
to April 1998
to September 2008
1.047
1.749
Interest on Overdue Tax
Income tax/CGT/NIC
Inheritance tax
VAT
Corporation tax
CTSA instalments
6.5% from 6 November 2008
3% from 6 November 2008
6.5% from 6 November 2008
6.5% from 6 November 2008
5.5% from 20 October 2008
Repayment Supplement
Income tax/CGT/NIC
Inheritance tax
VAT
Corporation tax
CTSA instalments
2.25% from 6 November 2008
3% from 6 November 2008
3% from 6 November 2008
3% from 6 November 2008
4.25% from 20 October 2008
Official Rate of Interest
From 6 April 2007
6.25%
Tax returns: 31 October
Deadline
If you were not aware that 31
October was the deadline for hard copy tax returns, it is a bit
late now. Well, not quite. Tax returns delivered by hand that are
found in the HMRC letterbox when opened on Monday, 3 November, will
be treated as delivered on Friday, 31 October, for all purposes and
will not attract a nonfiling penalty. Furthermore, the enquiry
window for that tax return will close on 31 October 2009.
Tax returns delivered by hand on
that Monday (or that are found in the HMRC letterbox when first
opened on Tuesday, 4 November) will not attract a penalty either.
However, in these cases the enquiry window will not close until 31
January 2010.
There is still the opportunity to
file tax returns online, and the deadline for electronic returns is
31 January 2009, but not once you have filed a hard copy.
Unfortunately, once you have filed a hard copy late, you cannot
avoid the penalty by then filing online before 31 January.
In all cases, the penalty will be
reduced to zero when all the tax is paid by 31 January 2009.
Residence: IR20 Judicial
Review
It is well known that Mr
Gaines-Cooper is challenging the refusal by HMRC to apply the
practice set out in their booklet IR20 on residence. Mr
Gaines-Cooper had taken the trouble to make sure that his visits to
the United Kingdom were below the 91-day limit contained in IR20
? the terms of which had remained pretty much unchanged
for decades ? and he therefore considered that he should
be regarded as nonresident. He claimed that, whatever might be the
strict legal position, the guidance contained in IR20 represented
HMRC's assurance on how they would apply the rules. He had
relied on their statement in organising his affairs, and he felt
that HMRC should not be allowed to go back on it. He sought an
order from the High Court to that effect.
HMRC disagreed and said that IR20
was not binding on them and taxpayers should not expect to rely on
it. It merely sets out how HMRC might approach the taxpayer's
position. Furthermore, HMRC cannot act outside the law, and if the
terms of IR20 differ from the strict legal position, to that extent
it would be ultra vires. Their duty is to collect tax, not
to impose taxes or forgo them. Accordingly, the taxpayer could not
have any legitimate expectation to rely on the terms of IR20. A
taxpayer's residence position had to be determined by reference
to the law, and the terms of IR20 were completely irrelevant. No
matter how carefully Mr Gaines-Cooper may have counted his days to
stay below the 91-day limit, that was not a concept enshrined in
the law, so it did not avail him anything.
HMRC had another interesting
argument. Even if they were bound to apply the terms of IR20, they
could not make a decision on a person's residence before the
matter had been to the Special Commissioners because, until that
time, they would not know all the facts. The matter would first
have to go to the fact-finding tribunal so that they could make
their decision. It would, therefore, not be possible to apply for
Judicial Review before the matter had been heard by the Special
Commissioners. However, after the Special Commissioners have made a
decision, the fact that they have ruled on the law means that you
cannot then apply for...
To continue reading
Request your trial