United States of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Robert James Poole, Respondent/Appellant., 806 F.2d 853 (9th Cir. 1986)

Federal Circuits, 9th Cir. (December 17, 1986)

Docket number: 84-5195

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/united-states-america-robert-james-poole-37661229
Id. vLex: VLEX-37661229

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Sponsored Ads:

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Dwayne Combs, Defendant-Appellant., 762 F.2d 1343 (9th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Allen Wauneka, Defendant-Appellee., 770 F.2d 1434 (9th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert James Poole, Defendant-Appellant., 794 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Winston Bryant Mcconney, Defendant-Appellant., 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregorio C. Perez, Jr., Aka 'Junior' Perez, Defendant-Appellant., 776 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1985)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

RSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7815, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,423 State of Alaska, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior; United States of America; Evelyn Foster, Defendants-Appellees., 67 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 1995)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir. - United States of America, Appellee, v. Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians; Red Lake Tribal Council; Roger Jourdain; Royce Graves; James Strong; Allen English; Lawrence Bedeau; George Jones; Adolph Barrett; Roman Stately, Jr.; Gerald Brun; Dan Raincloud, Jr.; Tom Stillday, Appellants., 827 F.2d 380 (8th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph William Kipp, Defendant-Appellant., 2 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Amador-Galvan, Aka Jose Amador Pullido-Villarreal, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo Molina, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 9 F.3d 1414 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklin Neil Brady, Defendant-Appellant., 819 F.2d 884 (9th Cir. 1987)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. George F. Semeil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael O'Connor; Et Al., Defendants-Appellees., 988 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Vincente B. Chuidian, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philippine National Bank, Defendant, and Raul Daza, Defendant-Appellee. Vincente B. Chuidian, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Philippine Export and Foreign Loan Guarantee Corporation, Intervenor, v. Philippine National Bank, Defendant, and Raul Daza, Defendant-Appellant., 912 F.2d 1095 (9th Cir. 1990)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Richard H. Krantz, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Phillip Briggs, Superintendent, Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility, Alaska Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee., 983 F.2d 961 (9th Cir. 1993)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - Quileute Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce Babbitt, in His Capacity as Secretary of the Interior; United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs; Interior Board of Indian Appeals; United States of America; Quinault Indian Nation, Defendants-Appellees., 18 F.3d 1456 (9th Cir. 1994)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugo Rincon, Defendant-Appellant., 984 F.2d 1003 (9th Cir. 1993)

See all citations to this document

Text:

Duane J. Deskins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff/appellee.

Brad Brian, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent/appellant.

Prior Report: 794 F.2d 462.

Before SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges and SOLOMON* District Judge.

ORDER

The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The panel has voted to amend the opinion as follows. Delete the body of the section entitled "A. Standard of Review" on page 465 of 794 F.2d, and substitute the following:

The determination whether a defendant was subjected to custodial interrogation is essentially factual, and is reviewable under the "clearly erroneous" standard. United States v. Wauneka, 770 F.2d 1434, 1438 (9th Cir.1985) (citing United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 101, 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1984)); United States v. Combs, 762 F.2d 1343, 1348 (9th Cir.1985).

In the 5th and 6th lines from the bottom of col. 1, page 467, delete the words "then applicable."

In the first full paragraph, col. 2, page 467, change the next-to-last sentence to read: "We conclude that the district court clearly erred in ruling that the questioning about name, date of birth and place of birth did not constitute interrogation."

Add a citation to United States v. Perez, 776 F.2d 797, 799 (9th Cir.1986), on page 466, col. 1, 15 lines from the bottom, after "see also " and before the citation to United States v. Booth.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of the court has voted against it. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

* The Honorable Gus J. Solomon, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Sponsored Ads:

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

Constitutions
Forms and Contracts
Legal Books and Journals
Case Law
News and Business
Regulations
U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access

Home / United States /

Case Law

vlex /