Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (May 18, 1999)
Docket number: 98-7029
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/us-v-ballard-18375273
Id. vLex: VLEX-18375273
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

U.S. Supreme Court - Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court - Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITNo. 98-7029 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versusFRANK EPHFROM BALLARD, a/k/a Tang, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis-trict Judge. (CR-96-19-BR, CA-98-5-7-BR)Submitted: March 30, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Janipher Winkfield Robinson, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAMFrank Ephfrom Ballard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 8). We conclude that Ballard fails to establish either that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in relation to his guilty plea or that his guilty plea was involuntary. See Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Little v. Allsbrook , 731 F.2d 238 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSEDTry vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access