Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (February 01, 2007)
Docket number: 06-7886
Not Published
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/us-v-oriakhi-27671066
Id. vLex: VLEX-27671066
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

U.S. Supreme Court - Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Cir. - John Hardy Rose, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee. John Hardy Rose, Petitioner-Appellee, v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellant., 252 F.3d 676 (4th Cir. 2001) Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee. John Hardy Rose, Petitioner-Appellee, v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent-Appellant.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7886UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versusFELIX ORIAKHI, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00072-PJM; 1:05-cv-3389-PJM)Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: February 1, 2007Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, SeniorCircuit Judge.Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Felix Oriakhi, Appellant Pro Se.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Felix Oriakhi, a federal prisoner, seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, which the district court correctly construed as a successive motion pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are likewise debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Oriakhi has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSEDTry vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access