US v. Shea (4th Cir. 1999)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (November 10, 1999)

Docket number: 99-7111


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/us-v-shea-18328524
Id. vLex: VLEX-18328524

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

Text:

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7111 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JOSEPH FRANCIS SHEA, a/k/a Diamond Joe, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior Dis-

trict Judge. (CR-93-55, CA-96-1198-2)

Submitted: October 8, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Francis Shea, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on July 28, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 29, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray

, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:

Joseph Francis Shea seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

9). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See

United States v. Shea

, Nos. CR-93-55; CA-96- 1198-2 (E.D. Va. July 29, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. DISMISSED

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access