Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (December 31, 1996)
Docket number: 96-6715
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/us-v-truesdale-18193541
Id. vLex: VLEX-18193541
Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITNo. 96-6715UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versusALVIN B. TRUESDALE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-34, CA-96-109)Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior CircuitJudge.Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alvin B. Truesdale, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICEOF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, forAppellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAMAppellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- , 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Truesdale , Nos. CR-92-34; CA-96- 109 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 1996). However, because the district court did not afford Appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard with respect to the imposition of the system of prefiling review, see In re Oliver , 682 F.2d 443, 446 (3d Cir. 1982), we modify the district court's order to strike the portion of the order conditioning Appellant's future filings in the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina upon his obtaining leave of court. We deny as meritless Appellant's motion for determination of status and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIEDTry vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access