* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30753 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE LEE GLENN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-354-E July 14, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Eddie Lee Glenn appeals his conviction of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and conspiring to possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Glenn also appeals his sentence. He contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence and erred by denying his requested instruction regarding use of extrinsic bad-act evidence; that the evidence was insufficient to support his - conviction; and that the 100:1 sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses violates the Due Process Clause, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Eighth Amendment.

First, the tips provided by the confidential informant and police corroboration of those tips gave rise to probable cause to stop the van driven by Glenn and to arrest Glenn. Gates v. Illinois , 462 U.S. 213, 241-46; United States v. CarrilloMorales , 27 F.3d 1054, 1062 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1163 (1995). Second, Glenn elicited the extrinsic-act evidence for which he sought a limiting instruction. He may not complain about an error that he invited. Tel-Phonic Servs., Inc. v. TBS IntÂ’l Inc. , 975 F.2d 1134, 1137 (5th Cir. 1992).

Third, the evidence indicated that the confidential informant and Eric Ardoin negotiated the crack cocaine transaction underlying GlennÂ’s conviction and that Ardoin enlisted GlennÂ’s assistance. Glenn helped Ardoin obtain and wrap the crack cocaine, then drove the crack cocaine from Houston to Houma, Louisiana. The evidence was sufficient to support GlennÂ’s conviction. United States v. Velgar-Vivero , 8 F.3d 236, 241 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Ayala , 887 F.2d 62, 67 (5th Cir. 1989).

Fourth, we have squarely rejected GlennÂ’s arguments regarding the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. United States v. Fisher , 22 F.3d 574, 579 (5th Cir. 1994). We remind counsel that federal public defenders, like all - counsel, have a duty not to pursue frivolous issues on appeal.

United States v. Burleson , 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

No. 96-30753 -