in the Matter of the Complaint of the United States of America, as Owner of the Uscgc Blackthorn, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. I.S. Joseph Shipping, Ltd., I.S. Joseph Company, Inc., Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., Pell Nederland, B.v. Termar Navigation Company, Turbana Banana Corp., Gulfcoast Transit Co., Abc Containerline, N.V., Wallenius Rederierna and Motorships, Inc., A/B Helsingfors Steamship Co., Ltd., and Alianza Naviera Argentina, D.A., Marthanassa Compania Naviera, S.A., Navios Corp. and Oceanside Ltd., Et Al., Claimants-Appellants., 720 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1983)

Federal Circuits, 11th Cir. (November 16, 1983)

Docket number: 81-6078


Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/uscgc-blackthorn-motorships-helsingfors-37026547
Id. vLex: VLEX-37026547

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Search in this document

Sponsored Ads:


Citations:

U.S. Supreme Court - Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303 (1927)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - in the Matter of the Complaint of Hercules Carriers, Inc., for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability as Owner of the M/V Summit Venture, Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. State of Florida, Et Al., Claimants, Canadian Transport Company, Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., I.S. Joseph Company, Inc., Ultraocean S.A., Sabine Towing & Transportation Company, Claimants- Appellants., 720 F.2d 1201 (11th Cir. 1983)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - in the Matter of the Complaint of Kingston Shipping Co., Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jeanette Roberts, Et Al., Defendants, Polish Steamship Company, I. S. Joseph Shipping Co., Ltd., I. S. Joseph Co., Inc., Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., Pell Nederland, B.V., Termar Navigation Co., Turbana Banana Corp., Gulfcoast Transit Co., Abc Containerline, N.V., Wallenius Rederierna & Motorship, Inc., A/B Helsingfors Steamships Co., Ltd., Alianza Naviera Argentina, S.A., Marthanassa Compania, Naviera, S.A., Navios Corp. & Oceanside, Ltd., Claimants-Appellants. No. 81-5343. Non-Argument Calendar., 667 F.2d 34 (11th Cir. 1982) Inc., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jeanette Roberts, Et Al., Defendants, Polish Steamship Company, I. S. Joseph Shipping Co., Ltd., I. S. Joseph Co., Inc., Clipper Maritime Co., Ltd., Pell Nederland, B.V., Termar Navigation Co., Turbana Banana Corp., Gulfcoast Transit Co., Abc Containerline, N.V., Wallenius Rederierna & Motorship, Inc., A/B Helsingfors Steamships Co., Ltd., Alianza Naviera Argentina, S.A., Marthanassa Compania, Naviera, S.A., Navios Corp. & Oceanside, Ltd., Claimants-Appellants. No. 81-5343. Non-Argument Calendar.

FeediconRSS What's this?

Cited by:

U.S. Supreme Court - Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Christopher A. Burger, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee., 785 F.2d 890 (11th Cir. 1986) Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Joseph Thomas, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Respondent- Appellee., 766 F.2d 452 (11th Cir. 1985)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Robert Lewis Wallace, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee., 757 F.2d 1102 (11th Cir. 1985) Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - USA v. Armando Garcia (11th Cir. 2006)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Wayne T. Lakes, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul Ford, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 779 F.2d 1578 (11th Cir. 1986)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Jack Howard Potts, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee., 814 F.2d 1512 (11th Cir. 1987) Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Roy L. Patterson, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sam Austin, Respondent-Appellee., 728 F.2d 1389 (11th Cir. 1984)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Roger Collins, Petitioner-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant., 892 F.2d 1502 (11th Cir. 1990) Petitioner-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Cir. - Henry Arthur Drake, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert O. Francis, Respondent-Appellee., 727 F.2d 990 (11th Cir. 1984)

Text:

David V. Hutchinson, Civ. Div., Torts Branch, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

Jack C. Rinard, Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Ted R. Manry, III, Tampa, Fla., Maslon, Kaplan, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty, Minneapolis, Minn., Holland & Knight, Gregg D. Thomas, Tampa, Fla., for claimants-appellants.

Dewey R. Villareal, Jr., Tampa, Fla., Arthur L. Schechter, Houston, Tex., for Kingston Shipping Co., Inc. and Apex Marine Corp.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This judgment of the district court is affirmed. The accident giving rise to the claim for damages in this case is the same as that in Kingston Shipping Co. v. Roberts, 667 F.2d 34 (11th Cir.1982), but the defendant is different. That opinion controls this case. However, in In the Matter of the Complaint of Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. State of Florida, Canadian Transport Company, et al., Case No. 81-6005, decided this same day (slip op. p. 715), 720 F.2d 1201, one member of our court suggests that the panel in Kingston, supra, misinterpreted Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927), and that our court en banc should consider the applicability of Robins to this type of case. Reference is directed to the Hercules opinion and special concurrence.

AFFIRMED.

Sponsored Ads:




Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access