Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly - Vol. 81 Nbr. 1, April 2004
Endres, Kathleen L
Permanent Link:
http://vlex.com/vid/wanted-female-amp-publisher-frames-civil-61743116
Id. vLex: VLEX-61743116
Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días
This article examines how specialized business magazine Editor & Publisher framed its coverage of the sex amendment of Title VU of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the legal foundation for the elimination of the help-wanted classified advertising categorized by sex. It charts the evolution of the coverage of its initial 1964 enactment to 1973 when the Supreme Court found commercial speech was not covered under the First Amendment and that laws prohibiting classified ads categorized by sex were constitutional. The article finds three stages in Editor & Publisher's coverage: 1964 to 1967, 1967 to 1970, and 1971 to 1973. In each of these phases, the sex amendment of Title VII was framed as being counter to the fundamental principles of the newspaper industry and the First Amendment. The sex amendment and its women supporters were trivialized and delegitimized in the frames crafted by Editor & Publisher.
'Help-Wanted Female': Editor &Amp; Publisher Frames a Civil Rights Issue
On a nationally televised broadcast, President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law promised to bring sweeping changes to the nation by prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations and employment, encouraging desegregation in the schools, and barring unequal application of voter registration requirements. The law also created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), with authority to review complaints but few enforcement powers.
Tucked under Title VIl of the Civil Rights Act was a provision that threatened to shake the newspaper industry to its foundation, force a redesign to the decades-old organization of employment classified advertising, and possibly cost the industry millions of dollars in advertising revenue by eliminating the gender-specific classifications. Under the new law, it became "an unlawful employment practice for an employer...to publish or cause to be...published any notice or advertisement relating to employment...indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination, based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin," except where a "bona fide occupational qualification" existed.1Confused and unsure how to proceed regarding Title VII, newspaper publishers, classified adverstising managers, editors, production supervisors, and attorneys looked to their trade magazine, Editor & Publisher, to keep them up to date. For the next nine long years, the magazine acted as a forum of opinion and reported on EEOC's changing guidelines, state laws, and human rights commission rulings affecting classified advertising, and court cases that promised to settle the matter.This article examines...Try vLex for FREE for 3 days
Access legal information from United States including:
Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.
3
days of Free Access
If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here