'Help-Wanted Female': Editor &Amp; Publisher Frames a Civil Rights Issue

Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly - Vol. 81 Nbr. 1, April 2004

Endres, Kathleen L
Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/wanted-female-amp-publisher-frames-civil-61743116
Id. vLex: VLEX-61743116

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Previous | Vol. 81 Nbr. 1, April 2004 | Next

Sponsored Ads:


Summary:

This article examines how specialized business magazine Editor & Publisher framed its coverage of the sex amendment of Title VU of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the legal foundation for the elimination of the help-wanted classified advertising categorized by sex. It charts the evolution of the coverage of its initial 1964 enactment to 1973 when the Supreme Court found commercial speech was not covered under the First Amendment and that laws prohibiting classified ads categorized by sex were constitutional. The article finds three stages in Editor & Publisher's coverage: 1964 to 1967, 1967 to 1970, and 1971 to 1973. In each of these phases, the sex amendment of Title VII was framed as being counter to the fundamental principles of the newspaper industry and the First Amendment. The sex amendment and its women supporters were trivialized and delegitimized in the frames crafted by Editor & Publisher.

Headnotes:

Extract:

'Help-Wanted Female': Editor &Amp; Publisher Frames a Civil Rights Issue

On a nationally televised broadcast, President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law promised to bring sweeping changes to the nation by prohibiting discrimination in public accommodations and employment, encouraging desegregation in the schools, and barring unequal application of voter registration requirements. The law also created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), with authority to review complaints but few enforcement powers.

Tucked under Title VIl of the Civil Rights Act was a provision that threatened to shake the newspaper industry to its foundation, force a redesign to the decades-old organization of employment classified advertising, and possibly cost the industry millions of dollars in advertising revenue by eliminating the gender-specific classifications. Under the new law, it became "an unlawful employment practice for an employer...to publish or cause to be...published any notice or advertisement relating to employment...indicating any preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination, based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin," except where a "bona fide occupational qualification" existed.1

Confused and unsure how to proceed regarding Title VII, newspaper publishers, classified adverstising managers, editors, production supervisors, and attorneys looked to their trade magazine, Editor & Publisher, to keep them up to date. For the next nine long years, the magazine acted as a forum of opinion and reported on EEOC's changing guidelines, state laws, and human rights commission rulings affecting classified advertising, and court cases that promised to settle the matter.

This article examines...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from United States including:

  • Constitutions
  • Forms and Contracts
  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • News and Business
  • Regulations
  • U.S. Code

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
resolucion de 10 de septiembre de 2001, de la secretaria general tecnica, por la que se notifica a los posibles interesados la interposici... | RESOLUCIÓN de 17 de marzo de 2008, de la Delegación Provincial de Cádiz, por la que se anuncia concurso por procedimiento abierto con tramitación de urgencia para... | United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v John P Mau Defendant-Appellant. 45 F.3d 212 7th Cir 1995 | Seccion: 02 Numero de Identificacion Unico: 07040 1 0016231/2007 Procedimiento: Procedimiento Ordinario 742/2007 Sobre Procedimiento Ordinario De D/na. ... | Decret du 5 octobre 2000 portant nomination du directeur de la technologie | 33 CFR 174.11 Applicability of State numbering system. | Acordao N 70015474349 of Tribunal de Justica do RS - Decima Camara Civel, of August 03, 2006 | sentenza nº 1198 of t.a.r - puglia lecce of february 24 2006 | Decisao Monocratica N 70026249797 of Tribunal de Justica do RS Vigesima Primeira Camara Civel of September 08 2008 | Acordao N 70007885106 of Tribunal de Justica do RS Decima Nona Camara Civel of Jun... | Francia extradita esta semana a España a tres miembros de ETA | Regolamento (CE) n. 1818/2001 della Commissione, del 14 settembre 2001, che fissa il prezzo massimo d'acquisto del burro per la 35a gara effettuata nel quadro de... | Acordao N 70023781743 of Tribunal de Justica do RS Decima Setima Camara Civel of May 20 2008

Previous | Vol. 81 Nbr. 1, April 2004 | Next