: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States that Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Woodrow Wilson Miles, Plaintiff Appellant, and Clinton F. Taylor; James S. Caroline, Plaintiffs, v. Carl Pendell, Unit Manager, Defendant Appellee., 43 F.3d 1467 (4th Cir. 1994)

Federal Circuits, 4th Cir. (December 27, 1994)

Docket number: 94-6884

Permanent Link: http://vlex.com/vid/woodrow-miles-clinton-caroline-pendell-37689642
Id. vLex: VLEX-37689642

Click here to download this article in graphic format (Acrobat Reader)

Document language

Request manual translation

Search in this document

Document options

Citations:

Loading article preview... cerrar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Cir. - John T. Gilbert, Plaintiff-Appellant. v. Ralph Dagrossa, Revenue Officer, Peter Wolf, Revenue Officer, and Cornelius J. Coleman, District Director of Internal Revenue Service, New Jersey District, Defendants-Appellees., 756 F.2d 1455 (9th Cir. 1985)

See other documents that cite the same legislation

Text:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-186-R)

Woodrow Wilson Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec . 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm.* Miles v. Pendell, No. CA-93-186-R (E.D. Va. June 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* The district court properly dismissed the claims against Appellee in his individual capacity as barred by qualified immunity. Collinson v. Gott, 895 F.2d 994, 998 (4th Cir.1990). Although the district court did not apply the correct standard in dismissing the claims against Appellee in his official capacity, the error was harmless because suits for damages against federal officials in their official capacities are barred by sovereign immunity. Hagemeier v. Block, 806 F.2d 197, 202 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1054 (1987); Gilbert v. DaGrossa, 756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1985)