Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
CourtNational Court
JudgeWoods J
Judgment Date16 June 1995
Citation(1995) N1335
Judgment NumberN1335
Year1995

National Court: Woods J

Judgment Delivered: 16 June 1995

N1335

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

[NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]

WS 202 OF 1994

ALBERT BAINE — PLAINTIFF

V

THE STATE — DEFENDANT

Mount Hagen

Woods J

13 June 1995

16 June 1995

POLICE — Actions for wrongs — Police raid on village — Destruction of property — Assessment of damages — Valuation of property — Corroboration required of valuation.

Counsel

P Kopunye for the Plaintiff

No Appearance for the State

16 June 1995

WOODS J: This is a claim for damages suffered by the plaintiff and his family from Ambine Village near Banz in the Western Highlands Province on 14 July 1992 when a number of police entered the village and looted and destroyed property. The State has failed to properly defend the action and judgement by default was signed against the defendant for damages to be assessed. Whilst the State did appear at a date for the trial on the assessment in May and an adjournment was granted it has failed to appear at this fresh hearing date.

The claim is brought by the Plaintiff who whilst living in Port Moresby has a house in the village and has filed this claim on behalf of himself and his parents and other relatives for the destruction and looting of four houses and the contents thereof. The Plaintiff states in evidence that he was contacted by his father after the incident happened and he came home from Moresby and took photographs of the site of the destroyed houses and assessed the goods destroyed and taken. The father gave evidence also of the destruction apparently done by the police following an incident when some young men from a neighbouring village had caused some trouble at a Mission. No explanation or legal reason was ever given by the police to the plaintiff or his father as to why the police did this destruction. There was no evidence of any alleged criminal...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
95 practice notes
  • William Mel v Coleman Pakalia, Commissioner of Police, The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (2005) SC790
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • July 1, 2005
    ...of Supreme Court to make an award of damages—whether case should be remitted to the National Court. 2 Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335, Andale More v Henry Tokam (1997) N1645, Cheong Supermarket Pty Ltd v Pery Muro [1987] PNGLR 24, Coecon Ltd v The National Fisheries Authority of PNG [......
  • Madang Cocoa Growers Export Co Limited v National Development Bank Limited (2012) N4682
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • May 18, 2012
    ...K60,330.46. Cases cited The following cases are cited in the judgment: Albert Areng v Gregory Babia (2008) N3469; Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335; Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (PNG) Ltd v Kila Wari (1990) N801; Coecon Ltd v The National Fisheries Authority of PNG [2002] PNG......
  • Martin Piaore v Ian Barr and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (2009) N3786
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • November 16, 2009
    ...v MVIT [1992] PNGLR 254; MVIT v Salio Tabanto [1995] PNGLR 214; Tabie Mathias Koim v The State [1998] PNGLR 247; Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335; Jonathan Mangope Paraia v The State (1995) N1343; Peter Wanis v Fred Sikiot (1995) N1350; Yange Lagan v The State (1995) N1369; Obed Lalip ......
  • Johannes Samot v George Yame and Concrete Aggregate PNG (2020) N8256
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • March 17, 2020
    ...J.) • Corroboration of a claim is usually required and the corroboration must come from an independent source. (Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335, National Court, Woods J; Kopung Brothers Business Group v Sakawar Kasieng [1997] PNGLR 331, National Court, Lenalia J.) • The principles of ......
  • Get Started for Free
95 cases
  • William Mel v Coleman Pakalia, Commissioner of Police, The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (2005) SC790
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • July 1, 2005
    ...of Supreme Court to make an award of damages—whether case should be remitted to the National Court. 2 Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335, Andale More v Henry Tokam (1997) N1645, Cheong Supermarket Pty Ltd v Pery Muro [1987] PNGLR 24, Coecon Ltd v The National Fisheries Authority of PNG [......
  • Madang Cocoa Growers Export Co Limited v National Development Bank Limited (2012) N4682
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • May 18, 2012
    ...K60,330.46. Cases cited The following cases are cited in the judgment: Albert Areng v Gregory Babia (2008) N3469; Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335; Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (PNG) Ltd v Kila Wari (1990) N801; Coecon Ltd v The National Fisheries Authority of PNG [2002] PNG......
  • Martin Piaore v Ian Barr and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (2009) N3786
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • November 16, 2009
    ...v MVIT [1992] PNGLR 254; MVIT v Salio Tabanto [1995] PNGLR 214; Tabie Mathias Koim v The State [1998] PNGLR 247; Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335; Jonathan Mangope Paraia v The State (1995) N1343; Peter Wanis v Fred Sikiot (1995) N1350; Yange Lagan v The State (1995) N1369; Obed Lalip ......
  • Johannes Samot v George Yame and Concrete Aggregate PNG (2020) N8256
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • March 17, 2020
    ...J.) • Corroboration of a claim is usually required and the corroboration must come from an independent source. (Albert Baine v The State (1995) N1335, National Court, Woods J; Kopung Brothers Business Group v Sakawar Kasieng [1997] PNGLR 331, National Court, Lenalia J.) • The principles of ......
  • Get Started for Free