Contingency Fee Multipliers: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Rare and Exceptional Circumstances Requirement

Published date06 November 2017
Law FirmButler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
AuthorHudson Jones
Subject MatterNatural Disasters,Property Damage,Contingency Fees,Homeowner's Insurance,Lodestar Method,Water Damage,Fee-Shifting,Insurance Litigation,Insurance Industry,FL Supreme Court,Denial of Insurance Coverage,Material Misrepresentation,Insurance Claims,Policy Terms,Hurricane Irma

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT