Court Rules Cabify Driver Should Be Registered As An Employee

Published date04 October 2021
Subject MatterEmployment and HR, Contract of Employment, Employee Benefits & Compensation
Law FirmL&E Global
AuthorMr Nicol's Grandi (Allende & Brea)

Labour Court ruled that a Cabify driver was misclassified and should be registered as an employee.

On 31 August 2021, in re "Bolzan José Luis vs. Minieri Saint Beat Guillermo Mariano and others", the First Instance Argentine Labour Court ruled that a driver of Cabify was misclassified as contactor and therefore, was under an unregistered employment relationship with Cabify, ordering payment of severance compensation, labour fines and salary differences due to his misclassification.

Section 23 of the Argentine Labour Contract Law No. 20,744 set forth that any provision of services by an individual to a third party in a regular manner, allows for the legal presumption of the existence of an employment relationship, unless otherwise proven. Based on such legal rule, the company to which an individual provides services has the burden to prove that no employment contract has been entered.

In this case, the First Instance Argentine Labour Court considered that even though the driver used his own car, he was performing Cabify's business activity and that the company was unable to rebut the legal presumption provided by Section 23 of the Argentine Labour Contract Law No. 20,744. The Court also ruled that said presumption also...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT