Directors Duties - Where a Company is Facing Insolvency
It is well established that the fiduciary and statutory duties
of directors are, in the main, owed to the company alone. However,
where a company is insolvent or is threatened with becoming
insolvent, this fundamental principal changes and the duty to act
in good faith and to show the utmost care, skill and diligence in
such circumstances, is owed to the creditors. This principle was
outlined by the Supreme Court in Re: Frederick Inns
Limited1.
This does not mean however that the directors of a company must
choose to close down the business and liquidate at the first sight
of economic difficulty. Having recognised a situation of
insolvency, the directors may have no choice but to recommend that
the company is placed in liquidation and that the remaining assets
realised and distributed for the benefit of the creditors; however,
this may not always be the case. It may be that by trading forward
a recovery is possible or that a more favourable outcome for
creditors could be achieved through realising the assets on a going
concern basis. Where it would be reasonable to continue to trade,
for example in an effort to complete a contract and generate
further revenue; such directors will not be on the hook for
reckless trading because they chose to continue trading rather than
close down and liquidate. In Re: Hefferon Kearns Limited (No.
2)2, the court commented that
"it would not be in the interests of the community that
whenever there might be significant danger that a company was going
to become insolvent, the directors should immediately cease trading
and close down. Many businesses which might have well survived by
continuing to trade coupled with remedial measures could be lost to
the community".
It is important however to contrast this scenario of cautiously
continuing with business in spite of economic difficulties with the
situation in which an insolvent company is not being wound up and
the principal reason it is not being wound up is the insufficiency
of its assets, i.e.; that the company's assets would not be
sufficient to cover the costs of a winding up. Section 251 of the
Companies Act 1990 is intended to address cases such as this and
identifies a number of remedies which a liquidator or creditor or
contributory may seek in such a situation which include:
The power of court to impose criminal and civil liability on
directors for failure to keep proper books of account;
The power to apply to court for return of assets of the company
improperly transferred;
The imposition of liability for fraudulent and reckless
trading; and
The restriction of the directors.
Matters which may give rise to personal liability for debts of
the company
When considering the circumstances in which the directors'
duties are owed to the creditors of the company, it is useful to
recall those situations in which some personal liability or other
sanction will be imposed. Within the general framework of Irish
companies legislation, the situations in which personal
responsibility will be imposed on the directors of a company
remain, however, the exception rather than the rule.
Fraudulent trading
If in the course of a winding up of a company, or where an
insolvent company is not being wound up, or in the course of an
examinership; any person found by a Court to be knowingly a party
to the carrying on of the business of a company with intent to
defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person;
or for any fraudulent purpose, may be guilty of fraudulent
trading.
Section 297 of the Companies Act 1963 (as amended) provides for
a maximum penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years
or a fine not exceeding €63,487.90 or both. In addition,
under Section 297A, any person may be held personally responsible,
without limitation of liability, for all or any of the debts or
other liabilities of the company as the Court may direct. Diverting
monies payable to the company to a director or shareholder,
incurring credit at a time when to the knowledge of the director
there is no prospect of that credit being repayable, non-payment of
monies to employees or to pension funds would all constitute
fraudulent trading.
It is important to note that any person, not just a director,
who is knowingly a party to fraudulent trading can be held liable.
In addition, one instance of fraudulent behaviour will suffice to
make a finding of fraudulent trading. In Re Hunting Lodge
Limited3 on the sale of the only remaining company
asset, there was a secret arrangement to divert half of the
proceeds to a building society account with fictitious names. The
company was insolvent at the time. It was held that this single
transaction was enough to constitute fraudulent trading by the
directors.
However, in order to impose liability, fraudulent intent must be
proven, which can be difficult and a person cannot be held to be
knowingly a party to carrying on business with intent to defraud
unless he is a party to the actual impugned event.
Reckless trading
Because of the difficulty in demonstrating fraudulent intent,
the concept of reckless trading was introduced into Irish company
law. If in the course of the winding up of a company or in the
course of examinership proceedings or where an insolvent company is
not being wound up, it appears that any person...
To continue reading
Request your trial