Falling Into Arrears On Child Support Payments Could Mean Losing Your Passport!

New child support rules coming into force on 14th December 2018 give specific powers to the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) to pursue arrears.

Removal of driving licence or committal to prison

Since the Child Support Act 1991 came into effect, the CMS (and the Child Support Agency before that) has had a sizeable proportion of child support arrears which it makes efforts to recover. It has a number of effective legal tools over and above 'routine' debt recovery which it can use.

Removal of a driving licence for a period up to two years or imprisonment for a period up to six weeks have been standard options used by CMS and they have been effective in reducing the overall debt owed in respect of unpaid child support.

Removal of passport

New provisions effective from the 14th December 2018 mean that the CMS can now seek disqualification for holding or obtaining travel authorisation - effectively the surrender and removal of a passport.

Imagine the scene at the airport check-in: Mum, Dad and the children are heading off on holiday, but find that due to child support arrears for a first family, one of the parents can't go because their passport is not valid. If ever there was an incentive needed to pay child support, this is it. The legislation applies equally to both male and female parents, although the vast majority of non-resident parents are men.

In practice, it is highly unlikely to get to the stage of check-in queues. There is, naturally, a process to go through, so no one in the check-in line should be in any doubt of their validity to travel.

Procedure

Before we get to surrender of passports there has to be a liability order. This is effectively a court order for the sum due. Additionally, there then has to be a court application by CMS for the removal of the passport. This follows, more or less, the same guidelines as the rules in place for removal of driving licences and committal to prison.

The court requires to enquire into:-

  1. Whether the person needs a travel authorisation to earn a living. One view might be that the court will be less likely to make such an order if the passport is needed for work, thus depriving a person from earning a living. Conversely however, common sense dictates that a person will be more incentivised to clear arrears if their job is at risk.

  2. The person's means, essentially income and expenditure.

  3. Whether there has been wilful refusal or culpable neglect on the part of the person. In other words...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT