Important Recent Decision Regarding Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Corporations

Published date25 January 2022
Subject MatterCorporate/Commercial Law, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Corporate and Company Law, Trials & Appeals & Compensation, Personal Injury
Law FirmFreeman Mathis & Gary
AuthorMr Sean Phelan

In the recent Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas matter, Knox v. Seven Seas Cruises, No. 525, August Term 2020 (C.P. Phila. Co. Aug. 21, 2021 New, J.), the trial court issued a Rule 1925 Opinion requesting the Superior Court to affirm the trial court's decision to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The case involved a claim for monetary damages against an international cruise line regarding a cruise which was cancelled due to the COVID pandemic. The cruise in question had been scheduled to embark in San Diego and to disembark in Miami.

The Plaintiffs filed suit in Philadelphia County, claiming the Pennsylvania trial court had specific jurisdiction because the financial harms which the Plaintiffs allegedly sustained were related to the Panamanian cruise line's contacts in Pennsylvania, specifically, the cruise line's solicitation of the Plaintiffs' business and that of other Pennsylvania residents. After the filing of timely Preliminary Objections asserting the issue of personal jurisdiction, the court held that, even though the Defendant cruise line admittedly and directly solicited business from Pennsylvania residents, including the Plaintiffs' themselves, the court lacked specific personal jurisdiction over this foreign corporation because the alleged injury-causing incident involving the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT