Judge Rules Divorced Wives To Get A Job… Or Perhaps Not?

The topic of spousal maintenance has made the front page and headlines in several national newspapers and caught the attention of thousands of divorcing couples throughout the UK and Channel Islands, with titles such as "Get a Job Judge Tells Ex Wife" or "Divorce Laws Should be Tougher on Women".

Prior to the seminal case of White v White [2001] 1 AC 596 ancillary relief practice was to provide for the financially weaker party's (usually the wife's) "reasonable needs". In other words, once the wife's financial needs were satisfied, the family's remaining available assets were for the husband to keep. The case of White v White ended this approach, with the Court finding that there should be no bias in favour of the money-earner or against the home-maker/ child-carer as each contributes equally to the family. As a result, which party earned the money and built up the assets became largely irrelevant, and therefore, there would be no good reason why a wife should be confined to her needs, leaving the husband with the much larger balance of the family assets. White v White therefore represented a sea change in the approach of the Court to capital division. Case law since White v White has continued to demonstrate a trend towards greater equality in the distribution of capital on divorce.

THE MEAL TICKET: IS THIS THE END?

Inequality with respect to on-going financial support after divorce has (until very recently) remained. In this context however, the disadvantaged party was often the financially stronger one. Historically, on divorce, the wife (more often than not the homemaker) required on-going financial support (in the form of "spousal maintenance") for the parties' joint lives, a concept which has been colloquially referred to as a 'meal ticket' for life.

However, in recent years the joint lives order has been increasingly viewed by the Courts, the profession (and undoubtedly by many of the husband's concerned) as an out-dated concept, no longer applicable to modern life, particularly as wives today often have an earning capacity. This view is encapsulated in the recent English case of SS v NS (Spousal Maintenance) [2014] EWHC 4183 which marks a significant shift by the Courts from making joint lives orders towards (extendable) term maintenance orders. Where a joint lives spousal maintenance order is made the onus is on the payer (financially stronger party) to seek a variation should they wish the order to be amended, or even cease due to...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT