Methods Of Protection For Lenders, Purchasers And Tenants Involved In Construction Projects And The Impact Of The Contracts (Rights Of Third Parties) Act 1999 On The UK Construction Industry
The Need To Provide Remedies For Lenders, Purchasers And
Tenants
Those who provide the finance for a new development or who
acquire an interest in it, either as purchasers of the original
owner's or developer's interest or as tenants of the
completed building, will often be exposed to varying degrees of
financial risk in the event of the defective performance by one
of the parties involved in the design or construction of the
building. Lenders to the developer will require that in the
event of a developer's default they should have the ability
to realise their security and "build out" of the
difficulty, as well as having direct claims against contractors
and consultants for their defective performance in the
construction process. Potential purchasers may also sometimes
need the right to "step in" and secure the completion
of the development, and they and tenants will require remedies
if, after completion, defects emerge. Also, the original owner
may himself need direct remedies against his contractors'
and consultants' own sub-contractors.
Since the late 1980's it has been clear that such
remedies must be in contract. In D&F Estates Ltd v The
Church Commissioners for England [1989] A.C. 177 and
Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 A.C. 398,
the House of Lords removed the possibility of claiming in the
tort of negligence for the economic losses
(repair/reinstatement costs) flowing from defective building
work. As recent developments in tort liability have not
resurrected the possibility of tort claims in this context,
contractual mechanisms will remain as the sure method of
protection for lenders/purchasers/tenants.
Methods Of Protecting Lenders, Purchaser And Tenants By
Contract
There are different ways in which protection can be given.
Since the late 1980's, the practice has grown of requiring
contractors, sub-contractors and consultants to enter into
collateral warranties for the benefit of lenders, purchasers
and tenants, and sub-contractors to enter into warranties for
the benefit of the original owner/employer. Providing
collateral warranties has become the industry standard for
protecting such parties.
There is also a possibility in some circumstances of the
original owner/employer having claims under his contracts for
damages to cover losses suffered by third parties such as
purchasers and tenants. Sometimes a person with a right against
a contractor, sub-contractor or consultant will be able to
transfer that right to another...
To continue reading
Request your trial