Permitted Development Rights For Barns: Conversion Or Confusion?

In April 2014 there was great excitement amongst rural landowners about the introduction of new permitted development rights to convert barns to residential use without planning permission. It was anticipated that this would provide a way round the countryside planning policies that normally restrain such development.

But figures released after the first six months showed that more than half of the applications submitted to planning authorities for prior approval for such conversions had been refused; further, many refusals are being upheld at appeal.

The figures are in stark contrast to the prior approval applications for office to residential permitted development rights. We look at some of the more common reasons for refusal below.


The building to be converted must have been used solely for an agricultural use, as part of an agricultural unit, on 20 March 2013. Unsurprisingly, a building in Devon with a bathroom, skirting boards, numerous electricity sockets and French doors was found by an Inspector on appeal to have been in non-agricultural use!


The curtilage of the converted unit should be no larger than the floor area of the agricultural building itself. Planning authorities advise that this is one of the most common reasons for refusal. A proposed conversion in Devon fell foul of this limitation and was refused on appeal.

The Inspector determined that he had no powers to impose a condition restricting the extent of the curtilage, despite the appellant's request. It is important to ensure that applications comply with the limitations imposed from the outset.


The Order permits a change to residential use for up to three dwellings. In an appeal against a refusal in Somerset, the appellant, relying upon a consultation document published before the rights were brought in, tried to claim that three dwellings were permitted in addition to any other dwellings on the agricultural unit.

The Inspector ruled that the wording of the Order imposed a limit of three dwellings, which was a cumulative total of all dwellings on the agricultural unit - not three additional dwellings.


To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT