Claim Alleging Derivative Possession Of Good Allegedly 'Taken' In Violation Of International Law Still Precluded By FSIA

We discuss briefly the final installment (in the District Court) of the attempt to recover possession of a Van Gogh drawing allegedly sold away from the plaintiff's great-grandmother "under duress during the Nazi era in Germany for fraction of its fair value", Orkin v. The Swiss Confederation, 09 Civ. 10013 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2011) (LAK). An earlier dismissal in the case is discussed here. The District Court permitted the plaintiff a last chance to plead claims. The international practice rulings in the final decision, which dismisses the complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction, include the following:

First, the District Court summarized the plaintiff's claim as one complaining that someone in German took advantage of the great-grandmother's plight and desperation as a Jew in Nazi Germany to purchase the drawing at an artifically low price and, years later, "donated or bequeathed the drawing to one of the defendants". The difficulty in the plaintiff's case continues to be that the Foundation sued never possessed the painting and so "would not be a proper party defendant to this action, quite apart from questions of jurisdiction".

The District Court also addressed the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act issue on the assumption that the Swiss Confederation is a foreign state and the Foundation was "among its agencies and instrumentalities". The Court could not find any applicable exception to the FSIA, which is the possible only source of subject matter jurisdiction. In order for the takings exception to the FSIA to apply, the plaintiff must allege acts of "a sovereign, not a private...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT