Directors Of A Company In Administration Retain Residual Powers To Challenge Appointment Of Administrators

A recent case brought before Lord Glennie in the Outer House of the Court of Session has determined and clarified two distinct matters relating to paragraphs 14 and 74 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (the "Act").

Firstly, it confirmed that where a company is in administration, the Company and the board of directors retain residual powers which include instructing solicitors to challenge the appointment of an Administrator.

Secondly, it confirmed that a floating charge is a "qualifying floating charge" if any one of the sub-sections in Paragraph 14(2) of Schedule B1 to the Act are satisfied.

Facts of the Case

The Petition sought to challenge the validity of the appointment of Administrators by The Royal Bank of Scotland pursuant to a floating charge created in favour of the Bank. The Petitioner argued that many of the transactions executed by the Bank purportedly pursuant to a loan agreement with the company were invalid.

Paragraph 74 of Schedule B1 to the Act provides that a creditor or member of a company in administration may apply to the court claiming that the Administrator is acting or has acted or proposes to act in a way which would unfairly harm his interests.

Lord Glennie considered the use of paragraph 74 of Schedule B1 to the Act and disagreed that this provision acted as a prohibition against a company in administration or officers of such a company from bringing proceedings to reduce the appointment of Administrators. In coming to this conclusion, Lord Glennie found that paragraph 64 of Schedule B1 to the Act, whereby neither a company in administration nor an officer of such a company may exercise a "management power" without the consent of the Administrator, would not have the effect of preventing the Company bringing proceedings to reduce the appointment of the Administrators. Instead, this provision is designed to prohibit the exercise of a power which would interfere with the exercise of the Administrators' powers and an action which merely calls into question whether the Administrators were validly appointed (and therefore whether they even had any powers to exercise in the first place) would not be caught by this prohibition.

Furthermore, following the decision of Plowman J in Re Union Accident Insurance Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 640, Lord Glennie confirmed that the board of directors of a company retain residual powers which include the power to instruct solicitors and counsel to oppose a petition for winding up a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT