M&C Reacts: Previous Planning Permission Does Not Permit Copying Of Architect's Drawings

Published date12 November 2021
Subject MatterIntellectual Property, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Copyright, Arbitration & Dispute Resolution
Law FirmMarks & Clerk
AuthorMr Graham Burnett-Hall

It is rare that intellectual property disputes are decided by way of summary judgment but here is one example, arising in a copyright dispute. The case is Lennox Estates Ltd v S&W Ventures Ltd and a summary judgment application that was decided on 8 November 2021. Lennox Estates, a property developer, had an option to purchase a property subject to planning permission being obtained. They instructed architects to prepare design drawings and planning permission was obtained, based on those drawings. Copyright in the architect's drawings was assigned to Lennox Estates. However, they did not exercise the option, which subsequently lapsed. S&W Ventures acquired the property with the benefit of the planning permission. They modified the planning permission but, as the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court held, the design of the architect's plans was overwhelmingly retained...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT