The State v Rose Yapriha

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
Citation(1997) N1741
Date16 December 1997
CourtNational Court
Year1997

National Court: Bidar AJ

Judgment Delivered: 16 December 1997

1 Criminal law—Unlawful Assault—Grievous Bodily Harm—Self defence—Onus of proof—Criminal Code s319, s270, s271. Constitution Sch2.2

2 Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462, Chan Kau v R [1955] AC 206, R v Howe [1958] 100 CLR 448 and R v David Daure [1967–68] PNGLR 19 referred to

___________________________

Bidar AJ: The accused, ROSE YAPRIHA, is before this Court upon an indictment that on 28 December 1996 she unlawfully did grievous bodily harm to one, DOREEN YAPRIHA, an offence pursuant to s319 of the Criminal Code (Ch262).

Upon arraignment accused admitted to cutting the victim with a bush–knife on her left wrist and inflicting a serious wound.

Mr Tusais of Counsel for the accused sought and was granted leave under s563 of the Code to enter a plea of not guilty on behalf of the accused.

State's case consist of oral sworn evidence of Doreen Yapriha whom the state alleges was unlawfully assaulted. Record of interview, statement by one other witness and medical report all admitted by consent.

Doreen Yapriha and accused Rose Yapriha have a common husband Seth Yapriha. Doreen and Seth Yapriha are originally from Green River area, Sandaun Province while, Rose Yapriha comes from Wewak, East Sepik Province. They all live together in one house. Tragedy struck the family, when, on 28 December 1996, Seth Yapriha, broke the news of death of Doreen's nephew back in the village. On hearing this, her heart was broken, she cried, was upset and angry at her elder sister and her husband Seth. She said some words in her language which were basically directed to her elder sister and mother of deceased nephew. She also spoke in pidgin language directed to her husband who was by then down–stairs with accused and children preparing breakfast. The words she directed to her husband Seth were to the effect that, he enjoys using her body only and does not make it possible for her to go home and perhaps see the nephew's grave. As there was certain bad words or foul language used at her husband, the accused joined in and shouted at Doreen who was still up in the house.

It is clear that Doreen had not sworn at or used any bad words to the accused personally. Her remarks were directed to their husband Seth. Basically her message to their husband was that Seth should have got her an air–line ticket to go home to see her nephew or least his grave. Doreen kept telling accused her remarks had nothing to do with her but the accused kept on calling up to her and making various remarks. Doreen who was in a state of sorrow and grief over the death of her nephew and angry with her husband picked up a flower pot from the house and threw it down on the ground. She then came...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
  • Cosmas Kutau Kitawal and Christopher Kutau v The State (2007) SC927
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • February 22, 2007
    ...Warun (1989) N753; The State v Pennias Mokei (No 1) (2004) N2606; The State v Peter Oh Piom Mo [1998] PNGLR 66; The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Takip Palne of Dumbol [1976] PNGLR 90 APPEAL This was an appeal against conviction and sentence for wilful murder. 1. BY THE COU......
  • The State v Sam Piapin (2009) N3585
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • February 18, 2009
    ...severed—guilty plea—sentence of 3 years—part of sentence suspended—s19 and s319 Criminal Code. Cases cited: The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Kopiwan Pupuni (1998) N1709; The State v Apa Kuman (2000] PNGLR 313; The State v Darius Taulo (2001) N2034; The State v Nickson Pari......
  • The State v Jeffery Toapas (2006) N4485
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • August 22, 2006
    ...Melpa (2003) N2450; The State v Misari Warun (1989) N753; The State v Moses Jafisa Winga (No 1) (2005) N2952; The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Thomas Angup (2005) N2830 Abbreviations The following abbreviations appear in the judgment: ARB—Autonomous Region of Bougainville ......
  • The State v Pondros Laki (2010) N4164
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • October 15, 2010
    ...445 per Frost J at page 23; R v Korongin [1961] N204 at page 8 per Mann CJ; The State v Leah Tununtu (1990) N947; The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Michael Nema Melpa (2003) N2450; The State v Mathilda Edward (2004) N2726; The State v Albert Gias (2005) N2812; The State v L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Cosmas Kutau Kitawal and Christopher Kutau v The State (2007) SC927
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • February 22, 2007
    ...Warun (1989) N753; The State v Pennias Mokei (No 1) (2004) N2606; The State v Peter Oh Piom Mo [1998] PNGLR 66; The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Takip Palne of Dumbol [1976] PNGLR 90 APPEAL This was an appeal against conviction and sentence for wilful murder. 1. BY THE COU......
  • The State v Sam Piapin (2009) N3585
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • February 18, 2009
    ...severed—guilty plea—sentence of 3 years—part of sentence suspended—s19 and s319 Criminal Code. Cases cited: The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Kopiwan Pupuni (1998) N1709; The State v Apa Kuman (2000] PNGLR 313; The State v Darius Taulo (2001) N2034; The State v Nickson Pari......
  • The State v Jeffery Toapas (2006) N4485
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • August 22, 2006
    ...Melpa (2003) N2450; The State v Misari Warun (1989) N753; The State v Moses Jafisa Winga (No 1) (2005) N2952; The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Thomas Angup (2005) N2830 Abbreviations The following abbreviations appear in the judgment: ARB—Autonomous Region of Bougainville ......
  • The State v Pondros Laki (2010) N4164
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • October 15, 2010
    ...445 per Frost J at page 23; R v Korongin [1961] N204 at page 8 per Mann CJ; The State v Leah Tununtu (1990) N947; The State v Rose Yapriha (1997) N1741; The State v Michael Nema Melpa (2003) N2450; The State v Mathilda Edward (2004) N2726; The State v Albert Gias (2005) N2812; The State v L......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT