Mark Ekepa, Pala Teya, Yesu Kulina, Anga Atalu and The Other 22 Landowners Negotiating Committee (LNC) Agents and Porgera Landowners Association v William Gaupe and Job Mark Kutato, Perok Puli, Nelson Akiko and Karapus Yuwi (2004) N2694
Jurisdiction | Papua New Guinea |
Judgment Date | 13 October 2004 |
Court | National Court |
Citation | (2004) N2694 |
Year | 2004 |
Judgement Number | N2694 |
Full Title: Mark Ekepa, Pala Teya, Yesu Kulina, Anga Atalu and The Other 22 Landowners Negotiating Committee (LNC) Agents and Porgera Landowners Association v William Gaupe and Job Mark Kutato, Perok Puli, Nelson Akiko and Karapus Yuwi (2004) N2694
National Court: Cannings J
Judgment Delivered: 13 October 2004
1 Injunctions—interim orders—application to set aside—National Court's jurisdiction—inherent constitutional power of Court—National Court Rules, O12, r8—res judicata and issue estoppel—whether capable of providing complete defence to claim that interim injunction should be set aside—considerations to take into account when determining application to set aside interim orders—application of considerations—orders.
2 Employers Federation of PNG v PNG Waterside Workers and Seamen's Union and Others (1982) N393, Bauf and Nodai v Poliamba Pty Ltd [1990] PNGLR 278, Kaseng v Namaliu and the State [1995] PNGLR 481, Titi Christian v Rabbie Namaliu unreported, OS No 2 of 1995, 18.07.96, Tulia and Others v Lama and Others (1998) N1824, Supreme Court Reference No 3 of 1999: Special Reference under s19 of the Constitution by the Ombudsman Commission re Sitting Days of the National Parliament (1999) SC628, Tan v Pelis and Pelton Investments Ltd (1999) N1804, Gobe Hongu Ltd v National Executive Council and Others (1999) N1920 National Housing Corporation v Yama Security Services Pty Ltd (2000) N1985, Porgera Landowners Association Inc and William Gaupe v Ekepa and Others and Porgera Development Authority unreported, OS No 431 of 2000, 07.11.00, Supreme Court Review No 13 of 2002: Application by Anderson Agiru (2002) SC686, Supreme Court Reference No 3 of 2000: Special Reference under s19 of the Constitution by the Governor–General re Sitting Days of the National Parliament (2002) SC722, Golobadana No 35 Ltd v Bank South Pacific Ltd (2002) N2309, Supreme Court Review No 8 of 2003: Application by Anderson Agiru (2003) SC704, Mainland Holdings Ltd and Others v Stobbs and Others OS 418 of 2003, unreported, 29.10.03, American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd (1975) 1 All ER 504 referred to
Ruling on Motion
___________________________
N2694
PAPUA NEW GUINEA
[IN THE NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE]
OS NO 316 OF 2004
MARK EKEPA, PALA TEYA, YESU KULINA, ANGA ATALU AND THE OTHER 22 LANDOWNERS NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE (LNC) AGENTS
First plaintiffs
AND
PORGERA LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Second Plaintiff
V
WILLIAM GAUPE
First Defendant
AND
JOB MARK KUTATO, PEROK PULI, NELSON AKIKO AND KARAPUS YUWI
Second Defendants
MT HAGEN : CANNINGS J
6, 7, 13 OCTOBER 2004
RULING ON MOTION
Injunctions – interim orders – application to set aside – National Court’s jurisdiction – inherent constitutional power of Court – National Court Rules, Order 12, Rule 8 – res judicata and issue estoppel – whether capable of providing complete defence to claim that interim injunction should be set aside – considerations to take into account when determining application to set aside interim orders – application of considerations – orders.
Cases cited
Employers Federation of PNG v PNG Waterside Workers and Seamen’s Union and Others (1982) N393
Bauf and Nodai v Poliamba Pty Ltd [1990] PNGLR 278
Kaseng v Namaliu and the State [1995] PNGLR 481
Titi Christian v Rabbie Namaliu unreported, OS No 2 of 1995, 18.07.96
Tulia and Others v Lama and Others (1998) N1824
Supreme Court Reference No 3 of 1999: Special Reference under Section 19 of the Constitution by the Ombudsman Commission re Sitting Days of the National Parliament (1999) SC628
Tan v Pelis and Pelton Investments Ltd (1999) N1804
Gobe Hongu Ltd v National Executive Council and Others (1999) N1920 National Housing Corporation v Yama Security Services Pty Ltd (2000) N1985
Porgera Landowners Association Inc and William Gaupe v Ekepa and Others and Porgera Development Authority unreported, OS No 431 of 2000, 07.11.00
Supreme Court Review No 13 of 2002: Application by Anderson Agiru (2002) SC686.
Supreme Court Reference No 3 of 2000: Special Reference under Section 19 of the Constitution by the Governor-General re Sitting Days of the National Parliament (2002) SC722
Golobadana No 35 Ltd v Bank South Pacific Ltd (2002) N2309
Supreme Court Review No 8 of 2003: Application by Anderson Agiru (2003) SC704
Mainland Holdings Ltd and Others v Stobbs and Others OS 418 of 2003, unreported, 29.10.03
American Cyanide Company v Ethicon Ltd (1975) 1 All ER 504
Mr P Mawa for the plaintiffs
Mr A Manase for the defendants
CANNINGS J:
INTRODUCTION
This is an application to set aside two interim orders made by
Acting Justice Manuhu in the National Court at Mt Hagen on 16 and 18 June 2004. The case is about management and control of the Porgera Landowners Association Incorporated (the Association). A power struggle has been continuing for several years.
BACKGROUND
Meeting of 8 June 2004
On 8 June 2004 a meeting of the Association was convened at Porgera station in Enga Province. The defendants were elected as office-bearers. Mr William Gaupe, who is the first defendant, was elected as chairman. The other defendants were elected to various other positions. Mr Mark Ekepa, who is the principal plaintiff, was deposed as the chairman. Other plaintiffs, including Messrs Pala Teya, Yesu Kulina and Anga Atalu, were also deposed as office-bearers of the Association.
The plaintiffs claim that that meeting was unlawful. They say it was not held in accordance with the constitution of the Association. They say that the defendants’ purported election should be declared null and void. The plaintiffs claim that they have been the lawful office-bearers of the Association since 1995. They say that they remain the lawful office-bearers. They were removed from office unlawfully.
The defendants, on the other hand, say that the meeting was conducted lawfully in accordance with the registered constitution of the Association. They claim that this was the first annual general meeting of the Association since the Association was incorporated in 1992. Their election was lawful. They say the election was conducted under the auspices of the Electoral Commission.
Originating summons filed: 16 June 2004
Eight days after the meeting, on 16 June 2004, the plaintiffs filed an originating summons in the National Court. They seek the following orders:
1. A declaration that the purported Annual General meeting of the Second Plaintiff held at Porgera Station organized by the Defendants on 08th June 2004 was invalid, null and void and of no effect as it was not consistent with the Constitution of the Second Plaintiff.
2. A declaration that the purported election of the Defendants as Executives of the Second Plaintiff replacing the First Plaintiffs is invalid, null and void and of no effect as it was not consistent with the Constitution of the Second Plaintiff.
3. A declaration that the First Plaintiffs remain as the Executives of the Second Plaintiff.
4. An Order that the Defendants, their servants or agents or whosoever acting on their behalf be restrained from interfering with the business activities and affairs of the Second Plaintiff.
5. An Order that the Defendants, their servants or agents or associates be restrained from conducting, holding or convening of the business affairs of the Second Plaintiff.
6. An Order that the Defendants pay the costs of the Plaintiffs.
7. Such further or other Orders as the Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances.
Undertakings as to damages: 16 June 2004
On the same day that the originating summons was filed, 16 June 2004, three of the plaintiffs filed an undertaking as to damages, in the following terms:
In the event this Honourable Court finds for the defendants, the plaintiffs undertake to abide by any order this honourable Court makes or awards as to any proven damages the defendant shall have suffered by reason of any order of this Court.
The three plaintiffs who signed the undertaking were Mark Ekepa, Yesu Kulina and Anga Atalu.
Interim order: 16 June 2004
On the same day that the originating summons was filed, 16 June 2004, the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking interim orders to restrain the defendants from holding meetings of the Association and conducting the Association’s affairs, until their substantive claim was addressed.
On 16 June 2004 that motion was heard by Manuhu AJ. It was dealt with ex parte. That is Mr Gaupe and the other defendants (the office-bearers elected on 8...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Joshua Giru v Willie Edo (2007) N5032
...(No 1) [1995] PNGLR 481; Kiee Toap v The State (2004) N2766; Kila Wari v Gabriel Ramoi [1986] PNGLR 112; Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694; Mision Asiki v Manasupe Zurenuoc (2005) SC797; NEC & Luke Lucas v PEA [1993] PNGLR 264; O'Reilly v Mackman [1982] 3 WLR 1096; Orogen Minerals Ltd......
-
SCR 1 of 2012; Reference Pursuant to Constitution, Section 19(1); Reference by DR ALLAN MARAT, MP in his capacity as the Attorney - General and Principal Legal Adviser to the National Executive Council. In the matter of Prime Minister and NEC Act 2002 Amendments and Reserve Powers of the Governor General. ; SCR 2 of 2012; Reference by the National Parliament pursuant to Constitution, Section 19 (1) and (3) (a). In the Matter of: Sections 104 (2)(d); 109, 110, 115,141 (a), 142(2) of the Constitution; Prime Minister and National Executive Council (Amendment) Act 2011; Prime Minister and National Executive Council (Amendment No 2) Act 2011 (2012) SC1187.
...Wari v Gabriel Ramoi and Kingsford Dibela [1986] PNGLR 112; Kimbe Bakery Pty Ltd v Ben Jalatang (1993) N1274; Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694; Minister for Lands v Frame [1980] PNGLR 433; Milne Bay Provincial Government v Roy Evara [1981] PNGLR 63; Monomb Yamba v Maits Geru (also kn......
-
Doriga Mahuru, Maiva Mahuru, Mahuru Doriga, Max Doriga & Kuruku Nao v Hon Lucas Dekena, Minister For Lands & Physical Planning and John Ofoi, Acting Secretary, Department of Lands & Physical Planning and Henry Wasa, Registrar of Titles and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Ava Mika, Kila Gabutu & Michael John Madi (2013) N5305
...(2003) N2483 Lavu v Thompson & NBPOL (2007) N5018 Louis Medaing v Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd (2011) N4340 Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694 Mision Asiki v Manasupe Zurenuoc (2005) SC797 Mosoro v Kingswell Ltd (2011) N4450 Mudge v Secretary for Lands [1985] PNGLR 387 Musa Valley Ma......
-
National Housing Corporation v Paul Asakusa, as Suspended Managing Director, National Housing Corporation and Francis Pumbu (2012) SC1165
...SC1150; Isidore Kaseng v Rabbie Namaliu (No 1) [1995] PNGLR 481; Koitachi Ltd v Walter Schnaubelt (2007) SC870; Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694; Mision Asiki v Manasupe Zurenuoc (2005) SC797; Telikom PNG Ltd v ICCC (2008) SC906; Telikom PNG Limited v ICCC (2007) N3144; Titi Christia......
-
Joshua Giru v Willie Edo (2007) N5032
...(No 1) [1995] PNGLR 481; Kiee Toap v The State (2004) N2766; Kila Wari v Gabriel Ramoi [1986] PNGLR 112; Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694; Mision Asiki v Manasupe Zurenuoc (2005) SC797; NEC & Luke Lucas v PEA [1993] PNGLR 264; O'Reilly v Mackman [1982] 3 WLR 1096; Orogen Minerals Ltd......
-
SCR 1 of 2012; Reference Pursuant to Constitution, Section 19(1); Reference by DR ALLAN MARAT, MP in his capacity as the Attorney - General and Principal Legal Adviser to the National Executive Council. In the matter of Prime Minister and NEC Act 2002 Amendments and Reserve Powers of the Governor General. ; SCR 2 of 2012; Reference by the National Parliament pursuant to Constitution, Section 19 (1) and (3) (a). In the Matter of: Sections 104 (2)(d); 109, 110, 115,141 (a), 142(2) of the Constitution; Prime Minister and National Executive Council (Amendment) Act 2011; Prime Minister and National Executive Council (Amendment No 2) Act 2011 (2012) SC1187.
...Wari v Gabriel Ramoi and Kingsford Dibela [1986] PNGLR 112; Kimbe Bakery Pty Ltd v Ben Jalatang (1993) N1274; Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694; Minister for Lands v Frame [1980] PNGLR 433; Milne Bay Provincial Government v Roy Evara [1981] PNGLR 63; Monomb Yamba v Maits Geru (also kn......
-
Doriga Mahuru, Maiva Mahuru, Mahuru Doriga, Max Doriga & Kuruku Nao v Hon Lucas Dekena, Minister For Lands & Physical Planning and John Ofoi, Acting Secretary, Department of Lands & Physical Planning and Henry Wasa, Registrar of Titles and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Ava Mika, Kila Gabutu & Michael John Madi (2013) N5305
...(2003) N2483 Lavu v Thompson & NBPOL (2007) N5018 Louis Medaing v Ramu Nico Management (MCC) Ltd (2011) N4340 Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694 Mision Asiki v Manasupe Zurenuoc (2005) SC797 Mosoro v Kingswell Ltd (2011) N4450 Mudge v Secretary for Lands [1985] PNGLR 387 Musa Valley Ma......
-
National Housing Corporation v Paul Asakusa, as Suspended Managing Director, National Housing Corporation and Francis Pumbu (2012) SC1165
...SC1150; Isidore Kaseng v Rabbie Namaliu (No 1) [1995] PNGLR 481; Koitachi Ltd v Walter Schnaubelt (2007) SC870; Mark Ekepa v William Gaupe (2004) N2694; Mision Asiki v Manasupe Zurenuoc (2005) SC797; Telikom PNG Ltd v ICCC (2008) SC906; Telikom PNG Limited v ICCC (2007) N3144; Titi Christia......