Review Pursuant to Constitution s155 (2) (B); Stephen Mendepo v National Housing Corporation and Suas Properties and Investment Limited (2011) SC1169

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
CourtSupreme Court
Date29 November 2011
Citation(2011) SC1169
Docket NumberSC REVIEW NO. 42 OF 2009
Year2011

Full Title: SC REVIEW NO. 42 OF 2009; Review Pursuant to Constitution s155 (2) (B); Stephen Mendepo v National Housing Corporation and Suas Properties and Investment Limited (2011) SC1169

Supreme Court: Davani, Hartshorn, Murray, JJ

Judgment Delivered: 29 November 2011

REVIEW—Application for leave to review—signed by lawyer for applicant, not applicant—Objection to competency of review—verbal application made at the hearing of the application for leave—no written application—O5 r1 (f) of Supreme Court Rules.

REVIEW—Objection to competency of—no provision in the Supreme Court Act and Rules—objection can be raised at any time, at the discretion of the Court.

OBJECTION TO COMPETENCY—Courts authority to raise objection - can be by its own motion—Court to ensure the integrity of its own process—where abuse of process, Court must confirm its authority.

Facts

Before the commencement of the hearing of an application for leave to review, the first Respondent’s counsel raised a preliminary, threshold issue which was basically that the Review was incompetent because the applicant had not signed it, contrary to O5 r1 (f) of the Supreme Court Rules.

The Court noted that although the Supreme Court Rules did not provide for objections to Competency of Reviews, the Court proceeded to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
10 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT