The Independent State of Papua New Guina v Downer Construction (PNG) Ltd (2009) SC979
Jurisdiction | Papua New Guinea |
Date | 02 July 2009 |
Citation | (2009) SC979 |
Docket Number | SCA No. 5 of 2008 |
Court | Supreme Court |
Year | 2009 |
Full Title: SCA No. 5 of 2008; The Independent State of Papua New Guina v Downer Construction (PNG) Ltd (2009) SC979
Supreme Court: Gavara-Nanu, Kandakasi and Lay JJ
Judgment Delivered: 2 July 2009
CIVIL LAW- Supreme Court Appeal—Whether notice under s5 of the Claims By and Against the State Act, required for claims made against the State in arbitration proceedings.
CIVIL LAW—Whether the word “claim” in s5 of the Claims By and Against the State Act, includes a claim made in arbitration proceedings against the State.
CIVIL LAW- appeal - Claims by and Against the State Act s5 - whether the word "action" imports or includes "arbitration proceedings".
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION—Meaning of the words “claim”, “action” and “suit” in s1, s2 (1) and s5 of the Claims By and Against the State Act.
Facts
The Respondent brought arbitration proceedings against the Appellant pursuant to the provisions of a written contract between them. The Appellant made application for a declaration that the arbitration proceedings were unlawful because no notice of intention to bring those proceedings was given to the State pursuant to the requirement of s5 of the Claims by an Against the State Act.
Held (Kandakasi J dissenting)
The word "action" as used in s.5 of the Claims by and Against the State Act does not import or include the meaning of arbitration proceedings. A notice under that provision is not required prior to commencing arbitration proceedings.
Cases Cited:
Chief Collector of Taxes v TA Field Pty Ltd [1975] PNGLR 144; Commissioner General of IRC v Douglas Properties Ltd [2002] PNGLR 291; Mai Kuri v The State (No 2) [1991] PNGLR 311; Mark Opur v Darbar Enterprises Ltd (2004) N2528; MAS International Ltd v David Sode (2008) SC944; Rundle v MVIT [1988] PNGLR 20; Ruth Kaurigova v Dr Russo Perone (2008) SC964; Ted Abiari v The State (No 1) [1990] PNGLR 250; Application by Gabriel Dusava (1998) SC581; PLAR No 1 of 1980 [1980] PNGLR 326; Special Reference Pursuant to Constitution s19 by Morobe Provincial Government [2002] PNGLR 333; Inakambi Singorom v John Kalaut [1985] PNGLR 238; Chief Collector of Taxes v Bougainville Copper Ltd (2007) SC853; Norah Mairi v Alkan Tololo (No 2) [1976] PNGLR 125; Graeme Rundle v MVIT [1987] PNGLR 44; Paul Tohian v Tau Liu (1998) SC566; William Trnka v The State [2000] PNGLR 294; Daniel Hewali v PNG Police Force [2002] PNGLR 146; Patterson Lowa v Wapula Akipe [1991] PNGLR 265; [1992] PNGLR 399; Kiee Toap v The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (2004) N2766; Kamapu Minato v Philip Kumo (1998) N1768; John Bokin v The State (2001) N2111; Rawson Construction Ltd v The Independent State of Papua New Guinea (2004) N2604; Reference by Western Highlands Provincial Executive (1995) SC486
Overseas cases
Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers [1891] AC 107; Brennan v R (1936) 55 CLR 253; R v Hare [1910] 29 NZLR 641; R v Martyr [1962] Qd. R 398; Ward v R [1972] WAR 36; Williamson Pty Ltd v Barrowcliff [1915] VLR 450; Clunies-Ross v Commonwealth (1984) 55 ALR 609; Re Bolton: Ex parte Beane (1987) 70 ALR 225; Amatek Ltd v Googooreworn Pty Ltd (1993) 112 ALR 1; Wacando v Commonwealth 1981) 37 ALR 317; Re The Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd (1893) 19 VLR 333; Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589; Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; 67 ER 313; Madras Electric Supply Corporation Ltd v Boarland [1955] AC 667; Inland Revenue Commissioners v Hinchy [1960] AC 748 at 766 (H. L.); Commissioner for Railways (NSW) v Wynyard Holdings Ltd [1971] 2 NSWLR 70; R v Dunn [1973] 2 NZLR 481
Legislation Cited
Architects (Registration) Act 1989; Apprenticeship and Trades Testing Act 1986; Banks and Financial Institutions Act; Claims by and Against the State Act; Civil Aviation Act 2000; Central Banking Act; Civil Aviation (Aircraft Operators Liability) Act; Explosives Act; Motor Vehicles (Third-Party Insurance) Act; Organic Law on Peace Building in Bougainville Autonomous Bougainville Government and Bougainville Referendum; Public Finance (Management) Act; Statutory Interpretation by Donald Gifford
Texts Cited
Statutory Interpretation in Australia (5th Ed) [4.39]; Stroud’s Judicial Dictionary of Words and Phrases (7th Ed); Osborn’s Concise Law Dictionary (10th Ed)
2 July, 2009
1. GAVARA-NANU J: On or about 4 December 1997, the appellant and the respondent (“the parties”) entered into a written contract for the respondent to carry out road works to upgrade and seal certain parts of the Ramu Highway in Madang Province (“the Contract”).
2. The project was funded jointly by the European Union through the European Development Fund under the Lome IV Convention and the appellant. The Contract price of the road works was agreed at K40m. The respondent completed the task in or around mid 2002, and was paid in excess of K71m thus the initial agreed Contract price was exceeded by K31m. This increase was as a result of a number of factors, including work variations, delayed payments, loss of productivity by the respondent, etc, etc.
3. Later, the respondent made an additional claim of K48m through the Department of Works through its appointed supervisor for additional works it claimed it did but were not paid for. Negotiations for the payment of the additional amount claimed by the respondent failed as the appellant refused to pay the amount, claiming that the claim was made contrary to the terms of the Contract and was time barred.
4. As a result, the respondent elected to initiate arbitration proceedings by giving notices of disputes under the Contract, alleging that there were disputes between the parties to the Contract, able to be resolved by arbitration under the terms of the Contract. On or about 19 December, 2002, the respondent commenced arbitration proceedings.
5. In December, 2007, the appellant made an application before the National Court seeking a declaration that the arbitration proceedings were unlawful, claiming that the Contract upon which the arbitration proceedings were based was illegal because it breached the Public Finances Management Act. The presiding judge Davani J ruled that the appellant was clutching at straws as the time to make the application had well passed and refused the application.
6. The appellant did not appeal the ruling.
7. In January, 2008, the appellant made another application, this time seeking a declaration that the arbitration proceedings were unlawful because the respondent had failed to give notice of its claim to the State, as required under s5 of the Claims By and Against the State Act, (CBASA). On 7 February, 2008, the presiding judge Hinchliffe J, refused the application ruling that the arbitration proceedings were not in breach of CBASA. His Honour also refused the injunctive orders sought against the continuation of the arbitration proceedings.
8. The election by the respondent to institute arbitration proceedings was made pursuant to the General and Special Conditions of Contract, and the Procedural Rules on Conciliation and Arbitration of Contracts Financed by the European Development Fund (“the Rules”).
9. The relevant parts of the Rules are Articles 5.12, 18.1, 18.2 and 18.3.
10. Article 5 is headed—“Conciliation”.
11. Article 5.12 is in these terms:
5.12. Should a settlement not result, the parties shall be at liberty to refer their dispute to arbitration under these Rules, in which case, nothing that has transpired in connection with the proceedings before the Conciliator or Conciliation Committee shall in any way affect the legal right of any of the parties at the tribunal. (my underlining).
12. Article 18 is headed - “Commencement of Arbitration Proceedings”.
13. Article 18.1, inter alia, provides that the claimant in an arbitration, shall give to the respondent a notice of arbitration, Article 18.2 provides that arbitration proceedings shall be deemed to commence on the date on which the notice of arbitration is received by the respondent and Article 18.3 prescribes matters which the notice must include. Notably, these Articles are in mandatory terms.
14. The Rules provide a very detail and elaborate procedural requirements for the disputing parties to follow and comply with in conciliation and arbitration proceedings. The conduct of arbitration proceedings are governed by the Rules.
15. The respondent elected to commence arbitration proceedings for its additional claim pursuant to Articles 55 and 68 of the Contract.
16. The additional claim by the respondent for K48m was made pursuant to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
SCM NO. 16 OF 2009; Dr. Allan Marat Attorney General of Papua New Guinea and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea v Hanjung Power Limited (2014) SC1357
...Philip Kapal [1987] PNGLR 417 The Minister for Lands v. William Robert Frame [1980] PNGLR 433 The State v. Downer Construction (PNG) Ltd (2009) SC979 The State v. Independent Tribunal, Ex parte Moses Sasakila [1976] PNGLR 491 The State v. Zachary Gelu (2003) SC716 Thomas Kavali v. Thomas Ho......
-
Mathias Goma and 703 Others v Protect Security & Communication Limited (2013) SC1300
...SC1058 SCR No 6 of 1984; Re Provocation [1985] PNGLR 31 Telikom PNG Ltd v ICCC (2006) SC906 The State v Downer Construction (PNG) Ltd (2009) SC979 Timothy Bonga v Justice Maurice Sheehan [1997] PNGLR 452 Timothy Lim Kok Chuan v Simon Goh Say Beng (2004) N2753 Titi Christian v Rabbie Namaliu......
-
In the matter of s225 of the Constitution and in the matter of continuous power failure in Madang; PNG Power Ltd v Ian Augerea as Registrar of the National Court (2013) SC1245
...Reference Pursuant to Constitution s19 by Morobe Provincial Government [2002] PNGLR 333. The State v. Downer Constructions (PNG) Limited (2009) SC979. Inakambi Singorom v. Klaut [1985] PNGLR 238. Chief Collector of Taxes v. Bougainville Copper Limited; Bougainville Copper Limited v. Chief C......
-
Arran Energy (Elevala) Limited on its own behalf and as Operator of PRL 21 and Others v Hon Kerenga Kua OL and Others
...the Duties and Responsibilities of Leadership, Sections 27(4) and 28(1) (2017) SC 1645. The State v. Downer Constructions (PNG) Limited, (2009) SC979. South Seas Tuna Corporation Limited v. Betty Palaso as Commissioner General, Internal Revenue Commission and Anor (2019) SC 1761. The State ......
-
SCM NO. 16 OF 2009; Dr. Allan Marat Attorney General of Papua New Guinea and The Independent State of Papua New Guinea v Hanjung Power Limited (2014) SC1357
...Philip Kapal [1987] PNGLR 417 The Minister for Lands v. William Robert Frame [1980] PNGLR 433 The State v. Downer Construction (PNG) Ltd (2009) SC979 The State v. Independent Tribunal, Ex parte Moses Sasakila [1976] PNGLR 491 The State v. Zachary Gelu (2003) SC716 Thomas Kavali v. Thomas Ho......
-
Mathias Goma and 703 Others v Protect Security & Communication Limited (2013) SC1300
...SC1058 SCR No 6 of 1984; Re Provocation [1985] PNGLR 31 Telikom PNG Ltd v ICCC (2006) SC906 The State v Downer Construction (PNG) Ltd (2009) SC979 Timothy Bonga v Justice Maurice Sheehan [1997] PNGLR 452 Timothy Lim Kok Chuan v Simon Goh Say Beng (2004) N2753 Titi Christian v Rabbie Namaliu......
-
In the matter of s225 of the Constitution and in the matter of continuous power failure in Madang; PNG Power Ltd v Ian Augerea as Registrar of the National Court (2013) SC1245
...Reference Pursuant to Constitution s19 by Morobe Provincial Government [2002] PNGLR 333. The State v. Downer Constructions (PNG) Limited (2009) SC979. Inakambi Singorom v. Klaut [1985] PNGLR 238. Chief Collector of Taxes v. Bougainville Copper Limited; Bougainville Copper Limited v. Chief C......
-
Arran Energy (Elevala) Limited on its own behalf and as Operator of PRL 21 and Others v Hon Kerenga Kua OL and Others
...the Duties and Responsibilities of Leadership, Sections 27(4) and 28(1) (2017) SC 1645. The State v. Downer Constructions (PNG) Limited, (2009) SC979. South Seas Tuna Corporation Limited v. Betty Palaso as Commissioner General, Internal Revenue Commission and Anor (2019) SC 1761. The State ......