The State v Anos Naime Maraga, Hariki Badi and Gaigo Arua (2002) N2433

JurisdictionPapua New Guinea
CourtNational Court
Citation(2002) N2433
Date02 June 2002
Year2002

Full Title: The State v Anos Naime Maraga, Hariki Badi and Gaigo Arua (2002) N2433

National Court: Gavara–Nanu J

Judgment Delivered: 2 June 2002

1 CRIMINAL LAW—Sentence—Wilful murder—Maximum penalty to be reserved for worst type of offences—Circumstances in which maximum penalty may or may not be imposed—Extenuating circumstances warranting sentence less than the maximum.

2 CRIMINAL LAW—Sentence—Wilful murder—Criminal Law (Compensation) Act 1991, s2 and s4, Compensation Ordered as part of sentence—Compensation Ordered to restore community relations and harmony.

3 CRIMINAL LAW—Sentence—Wilful Murder—More than one Offender—Degree of participation in the crime to be reflected in the respective sentences imposed.

4 Ure Hane v The State [1984] PNGLR 105, Agiru Aieni v Paul T Tahain [1978] PNGLR 37, Goli Golu v The State [1979] PNGLR 653, Avia Aihi v The State (No 3) [1982] PNGLR 92, Kuri Willie v The State [1987] PNGLR 298, The State v Nyama [1991] PNGLR 127, R v Heroma Poia [1964] PNGLR 187, Secretary for Law v Witrasep Binengim [1975] PNGLR 172, Passingan v Beaton [1971–72] PNGLR 206, The State v Yapes Paege and Relya Tanda [1994] PNGLR 65, The State v Morobet Awui Koma and Peter Kevin [1987] PNGLR 262 referred to

Sentence

___________________________

Gavara–Nanu J: The accused have been convicted of the wilful murder of one Nicky Kelson, on 21 April 2001, at the Baruni Tatana junction, contrary to s299 of the Criminal Code (Ch262) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Criminal Code'). The maximum penalty for this crime is death.

The circumstances in which this crime was committed have been fully canvassed in the judgment and I do not wish to repeat them here but for the purposes of determining the appropriate punishment for the accused, I will restate the relevant facts.

The deceased was killed in the afternoon of 21 April 2001, by a bomb or an explosive devise (herein after referred to as 'the bomb'), which exploded as he was bending down to pick up a stone from a pile of stones under which the bomb was planted by accused Anos Naime Maraga (hereinafter referred to as 'Anos') with the assistance of accused Hariki Badi (hereinafter referred to as 'Hariki') and accused Gaigo Arua (hereinafter referred to as 'Gaigo'). In regard to Hariki, he assisted Anos by holding a gun and threatened the approaching Tatana people whom they had engaged in stone throwing fight along the Tatana causeway. He did that to keep the Tatana people at a distance to give Anos time to complete planting and concealing the bomb under the stones. And in regard to Gaigo, he assisted Anos with his presence as Anos was planting the bomb. He was also throwing stones at the approaching Tatana people also to keep them at a distance to give Anos time to complete planting and concealing the bomb.

Thus, the actual planting of the bomb was done by Anos. He was the actual perpetrator of the crime and Hariki and Gaigo having assisted him, are caught by s7 of the Criminal Code.

The killing of the deceased was the culmination of the events which took place earlier that day. It all started when the windscreen of Mr Brian Adira's tipper truck was damaged by some Tatana people in the morning when Mr Brian Adira who is from Baruni village went in his truck to visit his father in–law in Tatana village. After his windscreen was damaged, Mr Brian Adira went back to Baruni and told his father Mr Adira Gumasa about the incident. He then went to the Port Moresby Police Station with his father in law and reported the incident to the police.

According to Anos, he started drinking beer with his brother from 10.30 am until 4.30 pm that day. He learnt of the incident regarding Mr Brian Adira's vehicle at about 1.00 pm. Later in the afternoon, he went with Mr Brian Adira and other Baruni boys in Mr Brian Adira's truck and fought the Tatana people at the Tatana causeway. That was when he planted the bomb.

In regard to Gaigo, he said, he slept until about 2.00 pm, and when he woke up, he heard about his uncle's truck being damaged by the Tatana people. He later went to the Tatana causeway with Mr Adira Gumasa and Gaudi Adira. At the causeway, he helped other Baruni boys to fight the Tatana people.

Hariki said he was at the Rainbow Estate that morning. He drunk some beer there with Pispot Maraga for about three hours, then they went to Baruni. At Baruni, they continued drinking until about 4.00 pm. He later joined the other Baruni boys and went to the Tatana causeway and ended up taking part in the fight against the Tatana people. It was at that time, that he assisted Anos to plant the bomb.

It is to be noted that after the report was laid at the Port Moresby Police Station by Mr Brian Adira regarding the damage done to his truck by the Tatana people, the police went to the scene of the fight at the Tatana causeway. They got there while the fight was still in progress, but they did nothing to stop the fight or to arrest those who were involved in the fight. The police only went and escorted Mr Brian Adira's family out of Tatana village.

According to the police, the Tatana people armed themselves with sticks and other weapons and set up road blocks along the causeway so they had to clear those road blocks to drive into Tatana village and back. The failure by the police to arrest or to stop the fight cannot be overlooked in determining the punishment for the accused, because had they stopped the fight or effected arrests, the whole incident may have been prevented.

It is clear that the planting of the bomb under the pile of stones by Anos was deliberate. It was a trap because the two groups were throwing stones at each other in the fight and Anos knew that anyone from Tatana who picked up a stone from the pile of stones would be killed by the explosion, and that is what happened. The deceased who was pursuing the Baruni people was killed when the bomb exploded on his face as he was bending down to pick up a stone from that pile of stones to throw at the people from Baruni.

The decisions by Hariki and Gaigo to assist Anos in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • The State v Joe Ngotngot
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • July 29, 2016
    ...at K5,000 or less per prisoner to the same victim and the total compensation would exceed K5,000 [see cases: State v. Anos Naime Maraga (2002) N2433; State v Angaun Kakas, KakaliaTulu, Sukulin Passomb and Kalain Kula (1994) N1219]. 5. Apart from the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act, the Nati......
  • Ignatius Natu Pomaloh v The State (2006) SC834
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • April 27, 2006
    ...449 State v Tom Keroi Gurua, David Laiam Bawai and Joseph Nimagi (2002) N2312 The State v Anos Naime Maraga, Hariki Badi and Gaigo Arua (2002) N2433 The State v Ben Wafia, George Wena, Simon Konga and Leslie Puka (No 2) (2004) N2547 The State v Edward Toude and 3 Others (2001) N2299 The Sta......
  • The State v Pius Patrick Kosa Jnr
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • March 22, 2018
    ...the end, the total compensation paid under the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act would exceed K5, 000 [see cases: State v. Anos Naime Maraga (2002) N2433; State v Angaun Kakas, KakaliaTulu, Sukulin Passomb and Kalain Kula (1994) N1219]. Secondly, I note that apart from the Criminal Law (Compe......
3 cases
  • The State v Joe Ngotngot
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • July 29, 2016
    ...at K5,000 or less per prisoner to the same victim and the total compensation would exceed K5,000 [see cases: State v. Anos Naime Maraga (2002) N2433; State v Angaun Kakas, KakaliaTulu, Sukulin Passomb and Kalain Kula (1994) N1219]. 5. Apart from the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act, the Nati......
  • Ignatius Natu Pomaloh v The State (2006) SC834
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • April 27, 2006
    ...449 State v Tom Keroi Gurua, David Laiam Bawai and Joseph Nimagi (2002) N2312 The State v Anos Naime Maraga, Hariki Badi and Gaigo Arua (2002) N2433 The State v Ben Wafia, George Wena, Simon Konga and Leslie Puka (No 2) (2004) N2547 The State v Edward Toude and 3 Others (2001) N2299 The Sta......
  • The State v Pius Patrick Kosa Jnr
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • March 22, 2018
    ...the end, the total compensation paid under the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act would exceed K5, 000 [see cases: State v. Anos Naime Maraga (2002) N2433; State v Angaun Kakas, KakaliaTulu, Sukulin Passomb and Kalain Kula (1994) N1219]. Secondly, I note that apart from the Criminal Law (Compe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT