Steven Turik v Mathew Gubag
Jurisdiction | Papua New Guinea |
Citation | (2013) N5132 |
Date | 05 April 2013 |
Court | National Court |
Year | 2013 |
Full : WS NO 957 of 2011; Steven Turik v Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132
National Court: Cannings J
Judgment Delivered: 5 April 2013
CONTRACT—written agreement—alleged breach of contract—circumstances in which a cause of action in quasi-contract may arise—quantum meruit
The plaintiff claimed that he had a written agreement with the defendant under which he would be the sales agent on behalf of the defendant, who wanted to sell a piece of land, and negotiate with potential buyers and upon completion of the sale be paid by the defendant a commission of at least 10% of the sale price. The plaintiff claimed that after considerable time and effort he found a potential buyer and negotiated with him to sell the land for K230,000.00; then while negotiations were ongoing after the plaintiff mentioned to him what was happening the defendant without the plaintiff’s knowledge negotiated directly with the buyer and sold him the land for K180,000.00. The plaintiff asked the defendant for 10% of the sale price. The defendant refused to pay so the plaintiff commenced proceedings against the defendant claiming K18,000.00 commission and damages for breach of contract. The defendant denied liability on two grounds, first that there was no contract and secondly if there was a contract he had not breached it, instead it was the plaintiff who breached the contract as he failed to find a buyer.
Held:
(1) There was a written contract under which the plaintiff was to be paid a 10% commission upon successful completion of a sale that he had negotiated.
(2) There was no breach of contract by the defendant as the obligation to pay a 10% commission to the plaintiff only arose upon a sale that had been negotiated completely by the plaintiff, and here the plaintiff had only engaged in preliminary negotiations with the buyer.
(3) However, the plaintiff established a cause of action in quasi-contract in that he performed services pursuant to a contract and his completion of the contract was thwarted by the actions of the defendant and it would be unjust to allow the defendant to benefit from the contract and the services performed without paying just remuneration to the plaintiff.
(4) The appropriate remedy is to award the plaintiff a quantum meruit (the amount that is merited), ie a reasonable amount of money to remunerate him for services actually performed, which was assessed at half the amount (K18,000.00) that would have been earned if the plaintiff had completely negotiated the sale: K9,000.00.
(5) Interest calculated at the rate of 8% per annum on the quantum meruit from the date of service of the writ was awarded to the plaintiff, in the sum of K856.80; in addition the court, having regard to the fact that neither party was legally represented at the trial, fixed costs payable by the defendant at K1,000.00.
(6) The total judgment sum was K9,000.00 (quantum meruit) + K856.80 (interest) + K1,000.00 (costs) = K10,856.80.
Case cited
The following cases are cited in the judgment:
Delphi Corporate Investigations Ltd v Bernard Kipit (2003) N2480
Egga Pua v Otto Benal Magiten (2005) N2892
Leonard Gaua v Joe & Theresia Amir (2010) N3891
Leontine Ofoi v Kris Bongare (2007) N3248
National Housing Commission v Queensland Insurance (PNG) Ltd [1988-89] PNGLR 474
Paradise Farms Ltd v Bank South Pacific Ltd (2010) N3825
Patterson v NCDC (2001) N2145
Sonny Atua v Grace Kemmah (2012) N4687
Steven Naki v AGC (Pacific) Ltd (2005) N2782
The State v Barclay Bros (PNG) Ltd (2004) N2507
Tinange Tamase v MVIT [1992] PNGLR 244
Veltro Ltd v Steven Liu Huang (2006) N4608
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
This was the trial of an action for breach of a contract for services.
1. CANNINGS J: The question in this case is whether the court should order the defendant Mathew Gubag to pay any money to the plaintiff Steven Turik pursuant to an agreement that the plaintiff claims they entered into in January 2010.
2. The plaintiff claims...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reference by the Ombudsman Commission pursuant to Constitution, Section 19(1) re the Public Money Management Regularisation ACT 2017 (2020) SC1944
...of the Commissioner of Police (2014) SC1388 SC Review No 1 of 1990; Re Recount of Votes [1990] PNGLR 441 Steven Turik v Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 Tamali Angoya v Tugupa Association Inc (2009) SC978 Teine v University of Goroka (2019) SC1881 The State v Francis Kumo Gene [1991] PNGLR 33 The ......
-
Hubert Domayuong Shong t/as Hube Building Contractor v The Finschaffen District Development Authroity and Others
...Kipit (2003) N2480 Leontine Ofoi vs. Kris Bongare (2007) N3248 Teine vs. University of Goroka (2019) SC1881 Steven Turik vs. Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 Tirima v Angau Memorial Hospital Board (2005) N2779 Peter Wanis v The State (1995) N1250 Graham Mappa v PNG Electricity Commission (1995) PN......
-
Gago Teine and Gute Security Service Ltd v The University of Goroka (2019) SC1881
...1 All ER 177 Leontine Ofoi v Kris Bongare (2007) N3248 Putput Logging Pty Ltd v Ambalis [1992] PNGLR 159 Steven Turik v Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 The State v Barclay Bros (PNG) Ltd (2004) N2507 APPEAL This was an appeal against a decision of the National Court that ordered the second appell......
-
NKW Holdings Ltd v Paladin Solutions PNG Ltd (2020) N8339
...Resources Ltd (2013) SC 1275 Nivani Ltd v. Coconut Products Ltd (2016) N6582 Koroguen v. Wagen (2008) N3422 Steven Turik v. Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 Overseas Cases Banque Financiere de la Cite v. Parc (Battersea) Ltd [1999] AC 221 Counsel: Mr A Mana, for the Plaintiff Mr H D Katter with co......
-
Reference by the Ombudsman Commission pursuant to Constitution, Section 19(1) re the Public Money Management Regularisation ACT 2017 (2020) SC1944
...of the Commissioner of Police (2014) SC1388 SC Review No 1 of 1990; Re Recount of Votes [1990] PNGLR 441 Steven Turik v Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 Tamali Angoya v Tugupa Association Inc (2009) SC978 Teine v University of Goroka (2019) SC1881 The State v Francis Kumo Gene [1991] PNGLR 33 The ......
-
Hubert Domayuong Shong t/as Hube Building Contractor v The Finschaffen District Development Authroity and Others
...Kipit (2003) N2480 Leontine Ofoi vs. Kris Bongare (2007) N3248 Teine vs. University of Goroka (2019) SC1881 Steven Turik vs. Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 Tirima v Angau Memorial Hospital Board (2005) N2779 Peter Wanis v The State (1995) N1250 Graham Mappa v PNG Electricity Commission (1995) PN......
-
Gago Teine and Gute Security Service Ltd v The University of Goroka (2019) SC1881
...1 All ER 177 Leontine Ofoi v Kris Bongare (2007) N3248 Putput Logging Pty Ltd v Ambalis [1992] PNGLR 159 Steven Turik v Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 The State v Barclay Bros (PNG) Ltd (2004) N2507 APPEAL This was an appeal against a decision of the National Court that ordered the second appell......
-
NKW Holdings Ltd v Paladin Solutions PNG Ltd (2020) N8339
...Resources Ltd (2013) SC 1275 Nivani Ltd v. Coconut Products Ltd (2016) N6582 Koroguen v. Wagen (2008) N3422 Steven Turik v. Mathew Gubag (2013) N5132 Overseas Cases Banque Financiere de la Cite v. Parc (Battersea) Ltd [1999] AC 221 Counsel: Mr A Mana, for the Plaintiff Mr H D Katter with co......