Don Pomb Pullie Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki and Electoral Commission of Papua New Guinea (2000) SC651
Jurisdiction | Papua New Guinea |
Court | Supreme Court |
Citation | [2000] PNGLR 166 |
Date | 31 May 2000 |
Year | 2000 |
Full Title: Don Pomb Pullie Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki and Electoral Commission of Papua New Guinea (2000) SC651
Supreme Court: Sheehan J, Jalina J, Sawong J
Judgment Delivered: 31 May 2000
1 Practice and procedure—Costs—Application was an abuse of process and hopeless—Discretion of Court—liability of Counsel for costs wasted or thrown away.
2 Supreme Court Act (Ch37) s35 anomalous and reflects an error in drafting
3 Myers v Elman [1940] AC 282, Holden & Co v Crown Prosecution Service [1990] 2 QB 261, Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] 3 All ER 848, Orchard v Southeastern Electricity Board [1987] QB 565 referred to
4 National Court Rules, O22 r65, Supreme Court Act (Ch37), s8(1)(e), s35
Cases cited:
Myers v Elman [1940] AC 282; Holden & Co v Crown Prosecution Service [1990] 2 QB 261; Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] 3 All ER 848; Orchard v Southeastern Electricity Board [1987] QB 565
___________________________
By the Court: On 29 October 1999 this Court in its supervisory jurisdiction of judicial review ruled that an election petition brought by the First Respondent in the National Court be dismissed as the Respondent Petitioner was without standing. Because he was not registered on the Electoral Roll for the Kandep Electorate he was not entitled to vote in the election nor was he eligible to stand as a candidate for the electorate nor to bring an election petition challenging the result of the election in that electorate in the name of a person not on electoral roll.
On 5 November 1999 application was made to this Court for the review to be relisted for “the purpose of correcting perceived mistakes in the judgment and orders . . . due to a misapprehension by this Court of facts and or law and for the purpose of reversing its decision and reinstating the decision of the National Court”.
When the matter was called...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Investment Corporation of Papua New Guinea (Cross–Claimant) v Jimmy Maladina, Bernard Avery, David Lightfoot, John Beattie and Kelly Naru Trading as Carter Newell Lawyers (First Cross–Defendants) and Nusaum Holdings Limited (Second Cross–Defendants) (2004) N2603
...lawyers' conduct—Such clients have no recourse to legal remedy against the lawyers or the firm. 8 Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166, Embda Limited Trading as Tribal Plumbers v Tropical Habitat Limited N2067, Emas Estate Development Pty Ltd v John Mea [1993] PNGLR 215, Gul......
-
Joshua Giru v Willie Edo (2007) N5032
...Ltd v The State (1989) N769; Central Pomio Logging Corporation Pty Ltd v The State [1990] PNGLR 195; Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166; Gia Kewa Piel v Eric Ranpi [1996] PNGLR 396; Haiveta v Wingti (No 2) [1994] PNGLR 189; In the Matter of the Lawyers Act 1986 and In the ......
-
Rex Paki v Motor Vehicle Insurance Limited (2010) SC1015
...Commissioner of Police (1995) N1374; Bishop Brothers Engineering Pty Ltd v Ross Bishop (1989) N705; Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166; Gulf Provincial Government v Baimuru Trading Pty Ltd [1998] PNGLR 311; Island Helicopter Services Ltd v Wilson Sagati (2008) N3340; Jacob......
-
OS No 584 Of 2009; PNG Ports Corporation Limited v Canopus No. 71 Limited (2010) N4288
...Ambusa Copra Oil Mill Ltd (2001) N2106; Island Helicopter Services Ltd v Wilson Sagati (2008) N3340; Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166; PNG Waterboard v Gabriel M Kama (2005) SC821; Gulf Provincial Government v Baimuru Trading Pty Ltd [1998] PNGLR 311; Jacob Sarapel v Fre......
-
Joshua Giru v Willie Edo (2007) N5032
...Ltd v The State (1989) N769; Central Pomio Logging Corporation Pty Ltd v The State [1990] PNGLR 195; Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166; Gia Kewa Piel v Eric Ranpi [1996] PNGLR 396; Haiveta v Wingti (No 2) [1994] PNGLR 189; In the Matter of the Lawyers Act 1986 and In the ......
-
Investment Corporation of Papua New Guinea (Cross–Claimant) v Jimmy Maladina, Bernard Avery, David Lightfoot, John Beattie and Kelly Naru Trading as Carter Newell Lawyers (First Cross–Defendants) and Nusaum Holdings Limited (Second Cross–Defendants) (2004) N2603
...lawyers' conduct—Such clients have no recourse to legal remedy against the lawyers or the firm. 8 Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166, Embda Limited Trading as Tribal Plumbers v Tropical Habitat Limited N2067, Emas Estate Development Pty Ltd v John Mea [1993] PNGLR 215, Gul......
-
Rex Paki v Motor Vehicle Insurance Limited (2010) SC1015
...Commissioner of Police (1995) N1374; Bishop Brothers Engineering Pty Ltd v Ross Bishop (1989) N705; Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166; Gulf Provincial Government v Baimuru Trading Pty Ltd [1998] PNGLR 311; Island Helicopter Services Ltd v Wilson Sagati (2008) N3340; Jacob......
-
OS No 584 Of 2009; PNG Ports Corporation Limited v Canopus No. 71 Limited (2010) N4288
...Ambusa Copra Oil Mill Ltd (2001) N2106; Island Helicopter Services Ltd v Wilson Sagati (2008) N3340; Don Pomb Polye v Jimson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166; PNG Waterboard v Gabriel M Kama (2005) SC821; Gulf Provincial Government v Baimuru Trading Pty Ltd [1998] PNGLR 311; Jacob Sarapel v Fre......
-
Supreme Court Rules - Commentary by Justice Lay
...SC718. There is no stipulation in the rules that an Application for Leave to Appeal be served: Don Pomb Polye v Simpson Sauk Papaki [2000] PNGLR 166. Interlocutory Order. For cases on what is an interlocutory order see the commentary to the Supreme Court Act s Rule 5 Once leave is granted O......