In Criminal Malpractice Context, Accrual Occurs Not When Criminal Case Is Remanded But When Indictment Was Dismissed

Rogers v. Cape May County Office of Public Defender, 208 N.J. 414, 31 A.3d 934 (2011)

Brief Summary

The Supreme Court of New Jersey held that a criminal defendant's malpractice claim against his defense counsel accrued on the date the indictment was ultimately dismissed with prejudice, not when the appellate court in the criminal case reversed and remanded based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

Complete Summary

A client brought a legal malpractice action against the County Office of the Public Defender and one of its attorneys after a post-conviction appellate court reversed the client's drug convictions based on ineffective assistance of counsel and had remanded for a new trial, and after the indictment had been later dismissed with prejudice. The trial court denied the client's motion to file a late notice of tort claim. The client then appealed, and the appellate court affirmed.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey held that sufficient "exoneration" occurred, for purposes of New Jersey's Tort Claims Act's provision giving a trial court discretion when "extraordinary circumstances" exist to allow the late filing of a notice of claim within the one-year accrual of the claim. The Supreme Court of New Jersey was asked to revisit the term "exoneration" as used in its prior decision in McKnight v. Office of the Public Defender, 197 N.J. 180, 962 A.2d 482 (2008), to determine the timeliness of a legal malpractice action based on ineffective assistance of counsel in a criminal matter. The question was whether the plaintiff was "exonerated" at the point on which his conviction was reversed and the case...