Asking A Lawyer To Give An Opinion On Their Own Negligence? When Discovery Goes Too Far

Published date07 May 2021
Subject MatterLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Professional Negligence
Law FirmFogler, Rubinoff LLP
AuthorMs Samantha Green

In Marshall v. Jackson, 2021 ONSC 2361 (CanLII), released April 1, 2021, Justice Morgan overturned, in part, a Master's decision to require a lawyer sued for negligence to answer two questions refused on discovery.

Background

The questions related to the defendant lawyer's alleged negligence in the preparation and execution of a will. The first question asked the lawyer to advise "of the texts or sources that the Defendant regards as authoritative regarding the drafting of wills, including issues surrounding testamentary capacity and undue influence". The second question asked "whether the Defendant is aware of any cases or authority that indicates that a solicitor is not required to document evidence of testamentary capacity".

Result

On appeal, Justice Morgan reversed the Master's decision on these questions and ordered that they did not have to be answered.

In concluding that the questions were inappropriate, Justice Morgan stated that while a defendant lawyer can be asked to explain their understanding of the appropriate professional...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT