Choice Of Forum Clauses In International Contracts With Obligations Enforceable In Brazil And The New Brazilian Code Of Civil Procedure

Jurisdiction clauses are, in general, a very common contractual provision. They aim to avoid or minimize conflicts of laws, promoting greater security for contractors in what comes to the procedure and the location where disputes arising from that document will be resolved. However, this clause is not mandatory. It is a faculty of the contractors, and the freedom of contract to exercise this power is legitimized by Precedent No. 335 of the Supreme Court, which provides: "Choice of forum clauses are valid for lawsuits arising from the contract". This provision is especially important with regard to international agreements.

Brazilian law determines the concurrent jurisdiction between Brazilian and foreign courts. In other words, in addition to the competence of the Brazilian jurisdiction to handle the disputes arising from an international contract, an eventual action could also be filled before foreign courts.

However, in spite of the choice of forum having always been a legal possibility, Brazilian courts have held a position so far in the sense that, in certain cases of agreements between Brazilian and foreign companies, the Brazilian forum could not be excluded by the will of the parties. That is, the parties might not elect the foreign court exclusively.

This understanding was based on certain fundamentals and principles that oppose to the principle of freedom of contract and challenge the effectiveness of the jurisdiction clauses, such as the principles of National sovereignty, Social function and Adherence. Those principles have been understood as applicable in international contracts.

This position, which was reaffirmed in a recent decision, determined that the Brazilian forum could not be excluded if the contractual obligations had been fulfilled in Brazil and the parties had domicile in the country, even if the parties expressly agreed to it in the jurisdiction clause. In the same position, there are a large number of other decisions, including decisions of the Supreme Court.

However, the New Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure, which entered into force on March 18, 2016, included an express provision about the choice of foreign forum in international contracts that has no correspondence in the previous...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT