Ninth Circuit Confirms its Jurisdiction to Review Individual Issues That Have Been 'Definitively Resolved' By an Agency

Recently, in California Department of Water Resources v. FERC, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 3404 (9th Cir. February 24, 2004), the Ninth Circuit confirmed its jurisdiction to review discrete issues that have been "definitively resolved" by an agency order, even if other parts of that same order remain pending before the agency. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") had challenged the Ninth Circuit's jurisdiction to review such decisions, claiming that they were not "sufficiently final" to warrant appellate review. Id. at *1. FERC asked the Court to follow a District of Columbia Circuit case, which held that "once a party petitions [an] agency for reconsideration of an order, or any part thereof, the entire order is rendered nonfinal as to that party," and the party may therefore not seek appellate review of the order. Id. (quoting Bellsouth Corp., v. FCC, 17 F.3d 1487, 1489-90 (D.C. Cir. 1994)).

The Ninth Circuit declined to follow the D.C. Circuit, and instead reaffirmed that the Ninth Circuit's previous ruling in Steamboaters v. FERC, 759 F.2d 1382, 1387-88 (9th Cir. 1985), allowing review of issues that have been finally resolved by an agency, regardless of whether other issues remain nonfinal, remains the law in the Ninth Circuit. Id. at *3. The Court emphasized that judicial review of final aspects of agency decisions avoids needless delay, while a party waits "indefinitely" for an agency to resolve all pending issues in one order. Id. at *4. The Court noted that the risk of delay is exacerbated by FERC's "practice of denying motions for reconsideration and addressing previously unconsidered issues...