Effective Use Of Discovery Obtained Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1782 In Proceedings Before The English Courts
In proceedings before the English courts, there are specific
rules of civil procedure that can be used to obtain discovery from
U.S.-based persons who are not directly involved in the litigation.
However, it is often the case that a direct application to the U.S.
courts for discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 will be
quicker and will give rise to a wider scope of
disclosure.1
Party Discovery Obligations in English Proceedings
All parties to civil court proceedings in England and Wales must
give disclosure of relevant documents, subject to some very narrow
exceptions. "Disclosure" means formally declaring that
documents or classes of documents exist or have existed (akin to
discovery in U.S. proceedings). However, the scope of documents
that require disclosure in English proceedings on the standard
order is more limited than the broader general U.S. standard, in
that a party is required to disclose documents that adversely
affect its own case or that support or adversely affect another
party's case. The opposing party has a right of inspection of
any disclosed documents that are not privileged.
The obligation to disclose documents extends to documents that
are within a party's "possession, custody or power,"
so if you or your opponent has the power to call for relevant
documents (e.g., as a parent company, from a subsidiary
company located in the U.S.), an application under § 1782 will
not be necessary.
Importantly, English rules of procedure do not permit the use of
depositions for witnesses and experts. Witnesses file sworn
statements of evidence (which are taken as evidence in chief) and
then are cross-examined at trial. A similar process is used for
expert testimony. It is also relevant to note that almost all civil
proceedings are determined by a judge or panel of judges, rather
than before a jury. Juries are only used in certain types of
criminal proceedings in the UK.
Routes to Obtaining Third Party Disclosure in English
Proceedings
As noted above, an application under § 1782 will only be
needed where documents are held by third parties to the
proceedings.
Section 1782 states that an application for a discovery order
can be made in two ways, either indirectly, "pursuant to a
letter rogatory issued, or request made, by a foreign or
international tribunal," or directly, "upon the
application of any interested person."
In South Carolina Insurance Co v Assurantie Maatschappij
"de Zeven Provincien" NV [1986] 3 All ER 487 (HL),
the House of Lords confirmed that either mode could be used in
English civil proceedings. Lord Brandon noted that § 1782
"allows an application to be made either indirectly by the
foreign court concerned or directly by an interested party, and I
can see no good reason why the defendants should not have chosen
whichever of these two alternatives they preferred."
However, there can be an important tactical advantage in making
an application under § 1782 directly to the U.S. court, given
the broader scope of discovery in the U.S. than English law allows.
As a matter of English law, the types of documents that...
To continue reading
Request your trial