Environmental Marketing In Europe
Article by Avv. Felix
Hofer1
The European Approach
Up till now the Europe Union did not issue a set of harmonizing
principles and rules meant to specifically govern
'environmental/green marketing'.
The main reason for such approach was not disinterest from the
EU's institutional bodies towards the issue, but probably the
conviction of being the traditional regulations on commercial
communication perfectly suitable to cover this specific area in a
sufficient and proper way.
In fact, these provisions had already established a number of
basic principles requiring all commercial communication to:
not be misleading to the targeted public2,
be "readily recognizable as such and be distinguishable
from editorial content" (and all surreptitious promotional
messages to be explicitly banned)3,
not encourage behaviour grossly prejudicial to the protection
of the environment4,
not to result in a misleading commercial practice5,
a result that would occur any time:
it contains false information and is therefore
untruthful or in any way, including overall presentation, deceives
or is likely to deceive the average consumer, even if the
information is factually correct, in relation to one or more of the
following elements..: (a)..the nature of the product, (b)
its...main characteristics...such as its availability, benefits,
risks, execution, composition, accessories, .. method and date of
manufacture or provision, delivery, fitness for purpose, usage, ..
or the results to be expected from its
use
6,
it omits material information that the average
consumer needs, according to the context
7,
where «information requirements established by Community
law in relation to commercial communication including advertising
or marketing, a non-exhaustive list of which is contained in Annex
II, shall be regarded as material
8.
Obviously the EU did not miss the fact that environmental
aspects had become more and more relevant for a very broad range of
areas, impacting with significant (and frequently) negative effects
both, on contextual natural elements (polluting air, water, soil,
nature in general) as well as on manufacturing processes (e.g.
energy sources and consumption, carbon emissions, etc) and on
products' life cycle, their ? or their
components' - waste management and disposal.
The EU Commission's Directorates General also realized that
'green advertising' resulted in a very appealing marketing
tool to an increasing number of companies: to those trying to reach
out to an environmental conscious target public as well as to those
involved in particularly critical manufacturing processes (and
therefore intensely seeking to improve their corporate image with
the general public).
This additional aspect brought the issue of environmental claims
(and of their control) into play. To the purpose a research project
was assigned9 for preparing appropriate guidelines to be
considered by advertisers when using such claims in their
campaigns. The project's final report (dated December 2000)
basically recommended that environmental claims should refer and
adhere to the principles and indication of the ISO international
standards10 on 'Eco-Labelling'.
Following this path the Nordic Consumer Ombudsmen11
in 2005 decided that time had come for giving their earlier - in
1994 - adopted joint guidelines on 'Environmentally Oriented
Claims in Marketing' a refresh, considering that «a
greater awareness of environmental issues, working conditions and
social responsibility has led an increasing number of consumers to
take these aspects into consideration when shopping
,
while «companies often wish to express and display their
concern and awareness of the importance of these issues in their
marketing activities
.
The revisited guidelines set as key principles for environmental
marketing claims that all promotional messages:
must be accurate and balanced (i.e. making clear whether
claims, refer to a company's entire products' range or only
to some of them, to the packaging or other aspects, and avoiding
exaggeration on positive environmental impact),
should accurately consider the overall impression they convey
to the general public, making sure that such impression is based on
facts,
need to be phrased in a transparent and not misleading way and
must be able to offer proper substantiation on their claims
(possibly making the documents apt to sustain ethical claims
publicly available, e.g. on the company's website or in its
corporate information),
should use particular caution when referring to environmental
and ethical labels, where self-declared marks should pay attention
to avoid any potential confusion with official marks (in such cases
on all advertising material as well as on packaging there should
always appear a reference to where detailed information about the
used label system is available).
After its initially 'non-intrusive' approach the EU
Commission is now taking a far more pro-active position and has
recently adopted a specific Action Plan12, aimed at
promoting sustainable production and
consumption
by individuating the following list of
goals to be achieved:
(i) A new framework for environmental product
policy in order to push resource efficient and eco-friendly
products and raise the level of consumer awareness on the issue,
through:
increasing the existing eco-design requirements by extending
them to all energy related products and favouring
voluntary benchmarks of environmental
performance
,
reinforcing energy and environmental labelling through both,
covering a broader range of products through mandatory labelling as
well as favouring and promoting the use of the voluntary EU
Eco-label,
making financial incentives conditional on the achievement of a
certain level of energy or environmental performance and promoting
Green Public Procurement,
focusing on producers', retailers' and consumers'
education (also by sharing data and research on environmental
performance and impact of products and discussing these aspects in
open forums)
(ii) Providing a further impetus to promote
resource efficient and eco-innovative production, through:
boosting resource efficiency (i.e. more value by using fewer
resources),
supporting eco-innovation (also by establishing a reliable
third-party verification of the environmental performance of new
technologies),
enhancing the environmental potential of industry,
revisiting the voluntary EU eco-management and audit scheme
(EMAS Regulation),
creating a friendly regulatory environment for the development
of environmental industries in the EU (with a special focus on
Small and Medium Size Enterprises),
(iii) Contributing to sustainable consumption
and production internationally, through:
supporting both industry sectors in developing agreements for
achieving specific emission reductions or energy efficiency targets
as well as businesses intending to commit to reductions of
greenhouse gas emissions,
promoting sustainable consumption and production policies (SCP)
and sharing good practices on an international level,
creating a friendly legal environment for international trade
in environmental goods and services,
(iv) Performing concrete efforts...
To continue reading
Request your trial