ERISA: 502(a)(3) Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim DISMISSED: Repeated Calculation Errors Do NOT Involve "Fiduciary Duties"

Published date30 August 2021
Subject MatterEmployment and HR, Retirement, Superannuation & Pensions, Employee Benefits & Compensation
Law FirmLane Powell
AuthorMr Michael Reilly

We all are seeing more "breach of fiduciary duty claims" asserted in lawsuits seeking ERISA-governed benefits. As you know, ERISA allows participants, beneficiaries, and the Secretary of Labor to obtain relief against ERISA fiduciaries for breaching the fiduciary duties they owe to the plan or its participants. ERISA fiduciaries can also be liable under ' 502(a) for engaging in certain types of specified self-dealing and prohibited transactions under ERISA ' 406 that are per se fiduciary duty violations.

But what is a "fiduciary duty"? Do repeated calculation errors, or the failure to audit for calculation errors, involve "fiduciary duties"? NO.

This new case highlights the point: Morris v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 2021 WL 3509553 (C.D. California August 9, 2021)("...miscalculation [of benefits], the repeated affirmation of the miscalculation, and the failure to audit to catch miscalculations'all are inextricably entwined with the 'calculation of benefits,' which is 'a ministerial function that does not have a fiduciary duty attached to it.'")(Emph. added).

FACTS: In 2009, Morris sought ERISA-governed long term disability benefits during chemotherapy treatments for cancer. Aetna approved benefits, concluding she was totally disabled. Over the next ten years Aetna paid Morris based on the assumption that her employer paid Morris bi-weekly (26 paychecks a year)... but the employer had paid Morris bi-monthly (24 paychecks per year). Aetna's repeated ten-year calculation errors resulted in an overpayment to Morris totaling $56,478.

So, when Aetna discovered its repeated calculation errors and overpayment, it began reducing monthly payments to Morris. Morris sued alleging she was entitled to the higher benefit, and also asserted an ERISA 502(a)(3) claim seeking equitable remedies, like estoppel and waiver, claiming Aetna breached its fiduciary duties to her.

ISSUE: Whether Aetna breached its fiduciary duty because of repeated...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT