Escalator Stunt Gone Wrong: Case Dismissed Against Shopping Mall

Published date13 July 2021
Subject MatterLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Trials & Appeals & Compensation, Personal Injury, Professional Negligence
Law FirmRogers Partners LLP
AuthorMs Gemma Healy-Murphy

Summary judgment can be a powerful tool in a litigator's toolkit, if the Court can be persuaded that there is no genuine issue for trial. There appears a general judicial reluctance however to summarily dismiss an action, with the remedy oftentimes reserved for the most clearest of cases.

The recent decision of Lavoie v. Rainbow Centre Mall, 2021 ONSC 4166, is a case where summary judgment was granted. Brian Sunohara of Rogers Partners LLP represented the defendants.

In Lavoie, the 14 year old plaintiff sustained serious personal injuries, including fractures to his right leg, pelvis, wrists and jaw, when he grabbed onto the handrail of an escalator with his body on the outside of the escalator, lost his grip at the top and fell to the ground from a considerable height.

The teenager and his friends had previously been asked to leave the mall for similar conduct, where they were seen hanging off the side of the escalator and falling off when they reached a height of five feet or so.

Justice Gordon rejected the plaintiff's submission that because the escalator was a known area of horseplay, there was a foreseeable risk of harm to the plaintiff and the mall did not take all reasonable steps to protect the plaintiff from that risk. His Honour concluded that the use of the escalator in this manner was clearly inappropriate and ill-advised.

Apart from it being an obvious risk, there was no evidence before the Court to support that the defendants were aware of anyone previously using the escalator in this manner to a height that would jeopardize their safety.

His Honour went on to find that in any event of the foregoing, the plaintiff willing assumed the risk of the manner in which he used the escalator. He had to have known that when the escalator railing reached the top, he would have to let go, which would result in his falling from a considerable height.

Moreover, even if a duty of care...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT